Familial Clustering of Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community. Issue 3 (20th January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Delling, Francesca N.; Rong, Jian; Larson, Martin G.; Lehman, Birgitta; Osypiuk, Ewa; Stantchev, Plamen; Slaugenhaupt, Susan A.; Benjamin, Emelia J.; Levine, Robert A.; Vasan, Ramachandran S.
• Is Part Of: Circulation. Volume 131:Issue 3(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-01-20
• Subjects: Blood -- Circulation -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Blood Circulation; Cardiovascular System; Vascular Diseases; 616.1
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012594
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-7322

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background—</title> <p>Knowledge of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) inheritance is based on pedigree observation and M-mode echocardiography. The extent of familial clustering of MVP among unselected individuals in the community using current, more specific echocardiographic criteria is unknown. In addition, the importance of nondiagnostic MVP morphologies (NDMs; first described in large pedigrees) has not been investigated in the general population. We hypothesized that parental MVP and NDMs increase the risk of offspring MVP.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods and Results—</title> <p>Study participants were 3679 Generation 3 individuals with available parental data in the Offspring or the New Offspring Spouse cohorts. MVP and NDMs were distinguished by leaflet displacement >2 versus ⩽2 mm beyond the mitral annulus, respectively. We compared MVP prevalence in Generation 3 participants with at least 1 parent with MVP (n=186) with that in individuals without parental MVP (n=3493). Among 3679 participants (53% women; mean age, 40±9 years), 49 (1%) had MVP. Parental MVP was associated with a higher prevalence of MVP in Generation 3 participants (10 of 186, 5.4%) compared with no parental MVP (39 of 3493, 1.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.51; 95% confidence interval, 2.13–9.54; <italic>P</italic><0.0001). When parental NDMs were examined alone, the prevalence of Generation 3 MVP remained higher (12 of 484, 2.5%) compared with those without parental MVP or NDMs (27 of 3009, 0.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.25–5.10; <italic>P</italic>=0.01).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions—</title> <p>Parental MVP and NDMs are associated with increased prevalence of offspring MVP, highlighting the genetic substrate of MVP and the potential clinical significance of NDMs in the community.</p> </sec> </abstract>