Comparability of Measured Acceleration from Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitors. Issue 1 (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rowlands, Alex V.; Fraysse, FranÇois; Catt, Mike; Stiles, Victoria H.; Stanley, Rebecca M.; Eston, Roger G.; Olds, Tim S.
• Is Part Of: Medicine and science in sports and exercise. Volume 47:Issue 1(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Health aspects -- Periodicals; 612.044
• DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000394
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-9131

Abstract

<abstract> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec> <title>Background</title> <p>Accelerometers that provide triaxial measured acceleration data are now available. However, equivalence of output between brands cannot be assumed and testing is necessary to determine whether features of the acceleration signal are interchangeable.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Purpose</title> <p>This study aimed to establish the equivalence of output between two brands of monitor in a laboratory and in a free-living environment.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods</title> <p>For part 1, 38 adults performed nine laboratory-based activities while wearing an ActiGraph GT3X+ and GENEActiv (Gravity Estimator of Normal Everyday Activity) at the hip. For part 2, 58 children age 10–12 yr wore a GT3X+ and GENEActiv at the hip for 7 d in a free-living setting.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results</title> <p>For part 1, the magnitude of time domain features from the GENEActiv was greater than that from the GT3X+. However, frequency domain features compared well, with perfect agreement of the dominant frequency for 97%–100% of participants for most activities. For part 2, mean daily acceleration measured by the two brands was correlated (<italic>r</italic> = 0.93, <italic>P</italic> < 0.001, respectively) but the magnitude was approximately 15% lower for the GT3X+ than that for the GENEActiv at the hip.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Frequency domain-based classification algorithms should be transferable between monitors, and it should be possible to apply time domain-based classification algorithms developed for one device to the other by applying an affine conversion on the measured acceleration values. The strong relation between accelerations measured by the two brands suggests that habitual activity level and activity patterns assessed by the GENE and GT3X+ may compare well if analyzed appropriately.</p> </sec> </abstract>