Reliability of fully automated versus visually controlled pre- and post-processing of resting-state EEG. Issue 2 (February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hatz, F.; Hardmeier, M.; Bousleiman, H.; Rüegg, S.; Schindler, C.; Fuhr, P.
• Is Part Of: Clinical neurophysiology. Volume 126:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
• Page Start: 268
• Page End: 274
• Publication Date: 2015-02
• Subjects: Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Electromyography -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1388-2457

Abstract

<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author-highlights" id="ab005"> <title id="st100">Highlights</title> <sec> <p id="sp0005"> <list id="l0005"> <list-item id="o0005"> <label></label> <p id="p0140">Automated processing of resting state quantitative EEG is as reliable as visually controlled processing.</p> </list-item> <list-item id="o0010"> <label></label> <p id="p0145">Reduced inter-rater reliability is avoided by automated EEG processing.</p> </list-item> <list-item id="o0015"> <label></label> <p id="p0150">Automated processing of EEG is less time consuming and reduces the need for trained raters.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </sec> </abstract>