Goal setting, using goal attainment scaling, as a method to identify patient selected items for measuring arm function. Issue 1 (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ashford, Stephen; Jackson, Diana; Turner-Stokes, Lynne
• Is Part Of: Physiotherapy. Volume 101:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 88
• Page End: 94
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: Physical therapy -- Periodicals; Therapeutics, Physiological -- Periodicals; 615.8205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.04.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9406

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="author" id="abs0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sect0010">Objective</title> <p id="spar0005">Following stroke or brain injury, goals for rehabilitation of the hemiparetic upper limb include restoring active function if there is return of motor control or, if none is possible, improving passive function, and facilitating care for the limb. To inform development of a new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) of active and passive function in the hemiparetic upper limb, the Arm Activity measure, we examined functional goals for the upper limb, identified during goal setting for spasticity intervention (physical therapy and concomitant botulinum toxin A interventions).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0015">Design</title> <p id="spar0010">Using secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study, functional goals determined between patients, their carers and the clinical team were assigned into categories by two raters. Goal category identification, followed by assignment of goals to a category, was undertaken and then confirmed by a second reviewer.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0020">Participants</title> <p id="spar0015">Participants comprised nine males and seven females of mean (SD) age 54.5 (15.7) years and their carers. Fifteen had sustained a stroke and one a traumatic brain injury.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0025">Results</title> <p id="spar0020">Goals were used to identify five categories: passive function, active function, symptoms, cosmesis and impairment. Two passive function items not previously identified by a previous systematic review were identified.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0030">Conclusions</title> <p id="spar0025">Analysis of goals important to patients and carers revealed items for inclusion in a new measure of arm function and provide a useful alternative method to involve patients and carers in standardised measure development.</p> </sec> </abstract>