What are the factors of organisational culture in health care settings that act as barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice? A scoping review. (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- What are the factors of organisational culture in health care settings that act as barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice? A scoping review. (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- What are the factors of organisational culture in health care settings that act as barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice? A scoping review
- Authors:
- Williams, Brett
Perillo, Samuel
Brown, Ted - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Background</title> <p id="sp0005">The responsibility to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) in a health care workplace does not fall solely on the individual health care professional. Organisational barriers relate to the workplace setting, administrational support, infrastructure, and facilities available for the retrieval, critique, summation, utilisation, and integration of research findings in health care practices and settings.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Objective</title> <p id="sp0010">Using a scoping review approach, the organisational barriers to the implementation of EBP in health care settings were sought.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Method</title> <p id="sp0015">This scoping review used the first five of the six stage methodology developed by Levac et al. (2010). The five stages used are: 1) Identify the research question; 2) identify relevant studies; 3) study selection; 4) charting the data; and 5) collating, summarising and reporting the results. The following databases were searched from January 2004 until February 2014: Medline, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0025">Results</title> <p id="sp0020">Of the 49 articles included in this study, there were 29 cross-sectional surveys, six descriptions of specific interventions, seven literature reviews, four narrative<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Background</title> <p id="sp0005">The responsibility to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) in a health care workplace does not fall solely on the individual health care professional. Organisational barriers relate to the workplace setting, administrational support, infrastructure, and facilities available for the retrieval, critique, summation, utilisation, and integration of research findings in health care practices and settings.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Objective</title> <p id="sp0010">Using a scoping review approach, the organisational barriers to the implementation of EBP in health care settings were sought.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Method</title> <p id="sp0015">This scoping review used the first five of the six stage methodology developed by Levac et al. (2010). The five stages used are: 1) Identify the research question; 2) identify relevant studies; 3) study selection; 4) charting the data; and 5) collating, summarising and reporting the results. The following databases were searched from January 2004 until February 2014: Medline, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0025">Results</title> <p id="sp0020">Of the 49 articles included in this study, there were 29 cross-sectional surveys, six descriptions of specific interventions, seven literature reviews, four narrative reviews, nine qualitative studies, one ethnographic study and one systematic review. The articles were analysed and five broad organisational barriers were identified.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0030">Conclusions</title> <p id="sp0025">This scoping review sought to map the breadth of information available on the organisational barriers to the use of EBP in health care settings. Even for a health care professional who is motivated and competent in the use of EBP; all of these barriers will impact on their ability to increase and maintain their use of EBP in the workplace.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Nurse education today. Volume 35:Number 2(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Nurse education today
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Number 2(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0035-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- e34
- Page End:
- e41
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- Nursing -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals
Education, Nursing -- Periodicals
Soins infirmiers -- Étude et enseignement -- Périodiques
Nursing -- Study and teaching
Periodicals
610.7307 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.nurseeducationtoday.com/issues ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02606917 ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/links/toc/nedt/ ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals/nedt/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0260-6917;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0260-6917
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6187.028400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3554.xml