A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy
- Authors:
- Yoo, In Kyung
Lee, Jong Soo
Chun, Hoon Jai
Jeen, Yoon Tae
Keum, Bora
Kim, Eun Sun
Choi, Hyuk Soon
Lee, Jae Min
Kim, Seung Han
Nam, Seung Joo
Kang, Hyo Sung
Lee, Hong Sik
Kim, Chang Duck
Um, Soon Ho
Seo, Yeon Seok
Ryu, Ho Sang - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="abs0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sect0010">Background</title> <p id="spar0005">Low-volume bowel preparations have been shown to provide an equivalent cleansing effect as that of a standard 4 L polyethylene glycol. However, studies comparing the efficacy of low-volume bowel preparations are few, and the results have been controversial. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing quality and tolerability between sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0015">Methods</title> <p id="spar0010">A randomized study was performed with two hundred outpatients who were prospectively enrolled. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and the Aronchick scale were used to evaluate the bowel cleansing quality, and bubble scoring was also performed to back up both results. To investigate patients' preferences and tolerability, a questionnaire was administered.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0020">Results</title> <p id="spar0015">Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was not inferior to polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid in terms of successful bowel preparation (≥6 Boston scale score: 80% vs. 82%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.718, adequate Aronchick grade: 93% vs. 96%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.352). In addition, sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate caused fewer gastrointestinal symptoms, and tasted better than polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.</p><abstract abstract-type="author" id="abs0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sect0010">Background</title> <p id="spar0005">Low-volume bowel preparations have been shown to provide an equivalent cleansing effect as that of a standard 4 L polyethylene glycol. However, studies comparing the efficacy of low-volume bowel preparations are few, and the results have been controversial. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing quality and tolerability between sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0015">Methods</title> <p id="spar0010">A randomized study was performed with two hundred outpatients who were prospectively enrolled. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and the Aronchick scale were used to evaluate the bowel cleansing quality, and bubble scoring was also performed to back up both results. To investigate patients' preferences and tolerability, a questionnaire was administered.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0020">Results</title> <p id="spar0015">Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was not inferior to polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid in terms of successful bowel preparation (≥6 Boston scale score: 80% vs. 82%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.718, adequate Aronchick grade: 93% vs. 96%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.352). In addition, sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate caused fewer gastrointestinal symptoms, and tasted better than polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0025">Conclusions</title> <p id="spar0020">Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was not inferior to polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid in cleansing efficacy, and was found to have higher tolerability.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Digestive and liver disease. Volume 47:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Digestive and liver disease
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0047-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 131
- Page End:
- 137
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.33005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15908658 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.dld.2014.10.019 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1590-8658
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3588.345600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3364.xml