Up to a quarter of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiresorptive agents remain undiagnosed. Issue 1 (January 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Up to a quarter of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiresorptive agents remain undiagnosed. Issue 1 (January 2015)
- Main Title:
- Up to a quarter of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiresorptive agents remain undiagnosed
- Authors:
- Fedele, Stefano
Bedogni, Giorgio
Scoletta, Matteo
Favia, Gianfranco
Colella, Giuseppe
Agrillo, Alessandro
Bettini, Giordana
Di Fede, Olga
Oteri, Giacomo
Fusco, Vittorio
Gabriele, Mario
Ottolenghi, Livia
Valsecchi, Stefano
Porter, Stephen
Fung, Polly Pok-Lam
Saia, Giorgia
Campisi, Giuseppina
Bedogni, Alberto - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="abs0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="spar0005">Recent data suggest that the traditional definition of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) may exclude patients who present with the non-exposed variant of the condition. To test the hypothesis that a proportion of patients with ONJ remain undiagnosed because their symptoms do not conform to the traditional case definition, we did a secondary analysis of data from MISSION (Multicentre study on phenotype, definition and classification of osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with bisphosphonates), a cross-sectional study of a large population of patients with bisphosphonate-associated ONJ who were recruited in 13 European centres. Patients with exposed and non-exposed ONJ were included. The main aim was to quantify the proportion of those who, according to the traditional case definition, would not be diagnosed with ONJ because they had no exposed necrotic bone. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, median regression, and Fisher's exact test. A total of 886 consecutive patients were recruited and 799 were studied after data cleaning (removal or correction of inaccurate data). Of these, 607 (76%) were diagnosed according to the traditional definition. Diagnosis in the remaining 192 (24%) could not be adjudicated, as they had several abnormal features relating to the jaws but no visible necrotic bone. The groups were similar for most of the<abstract abstract-type="author" id="abs0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="spar0005">Recent data suggest that the traditional definition of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) may exclude patients who present with the non-exposed variant of the condition. To test the hypothesis that a proportion of patients with ONJ remain undiagnosed because their symptoms do not conform to the traditional case definition, we did a secondary analysis of data from MISSION (Multicentre study on phenotype, definition and classification of osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with bisphosphonates), a cross-sectional study of a large population of patients with bisphosphonate-associated ONJ who were recruited in 13 European centres. Patients with exposed and non-exposed ONJ were included. The main aim was to quantify the proportion of those who, according to the traditional case definition, would not be diagnosed with ONJ because they had no exposed necrotic bone. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, median regression, and Fisher's exact test. A total of 886 consecutive patients were recruited and 799 were studied after data cleaning (removal or correction of inaccurate data). Of these, 607 (76%) were diagnosed according to the traditional definition. Diagnosis in the remaining 192 (24%) could not be adjudicated, as they had several abnormal features relating to the jaws but no visible necrotic bone. The groups were similar for most of the phenotypic variables tested. To our knowledge this is the first study in a large population that shows that use of the traditional definition may result in one quarter of patients remaining undiagnosed. Those not considered to have ONJ had the non-exposed variant. These findings show the importance of adding this description to the traditional case definition.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Volume 53:Issue 1(2015)
- Journal:
- British journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 53:Issue 1(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 53, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 53
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0053-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 13
- Page End:
- 17
- Publication Date:
- 2015-01
- Subjects:
- Mouth -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Dentistry, Operative -- Periodicals
Face -- surgery -- Periodicals
Mouth -- surgery -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery, Oral -- Periodicals
Oral Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Dentistry, Operative -- Periodicals
Bouche -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Maxillaire supérieur -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Face -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Chirurgie dentaire -- Périodiques
Dentistry, Operative
Face -- Surgery
Maxilla -- Surgery
Mouth -- Surgery
Surgery, Plastic
Electronic journals
Periodicals
617.52059 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02664356 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.09.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0266-4356
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2314.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3410.xml