85. Deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil for motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Issue 1 (January 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 85. Deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil for motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Issue 1 (January 2015)
- Main Title:
- 85. Deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil for motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study
- Authors:
- Fichera, M.
Spagnolo, F.
Chieffo, R.
Houdayer, E.
Coppi, E.
Nuara, A.
Di Maggio, G.
Ferrari, L.
Libera, D. Dalla
Velikova, S.
Bianco, M.
Straffi, L.
Zangen, A.
Comi, G.
Volontè, M.A.
Leocani, L. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <p id="sp005">To evaluate the effect of repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation—rDTMS on motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease—PD in a randomized, placebo controlled study. Sixty patients underwent 12 sessions (3 sessions/week) of 10 Hz rDTMS, after randomization into 3 groups: Group 1 (real rDTMS on primary motor—M1 and prefrontal—PF areas); Group 2 (M1-real/PF-sham), Group 3 (M1-sham/PF-sham). Primary outcome was percent reduction of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, OFF therapy. Secondary outcomes were: changes in UPDRSIII sub-scores; improvement in timed tests (Hand Tapping—HT, Foot Tapping—FT, Walking Time—WT, Nine Hole Peg Test—NHPT). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney or <italic>t</italic>-test. Outcomes were tested in hierarchical order, by comparing the two real groups (1–2) only if their pooled data significantly differed from sham. No drop-outs or serious adverse effects were recorded. Both real groups improved significantly more than sham in UPDRSIII (<italic>p</italic> = .010 and <italic>p</italic> = .045, respectively), while they did not significantly differ between them. Pooled real groups showed a significant improvement vs sham in UPDRSIII (<italic>p</italic> = .007), tremor (<italic>p</italic> = .011) and lateralized sub-scores (<italic>p</italic> = .042 and<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <p id="sp005">To evaluate the effect of repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation—rDTMS on motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease—PD in a randomized, placebo controlled study. Sixty patients underwent 12 sessions (3 sessions/week) of 10 Hz rDTMS, after randomization into 3 groups: Group 1 (real rDTMS on primary motor—M1 and prefrontal—PF areas); Group 2 (M1-real/PF-sham), Group 3 (M1-sham/PF-sham). Primary outcome was percent reduction of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, OFF therapy. Secondary outcomes were: changes in UPDRSIII sub-scores; improvement in timed tests (Hand Tapping—HT, Foot Tapping—FT, Walking Time—WT, Nine Hole Peg Test—NHPT). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney or <italic>t</italic>-test. Outcomes were tested in hierarchical order, by comparing the two real groups (1–2) only if their pooled data significantly differed from sham. No drop-outs or serious adverse effects were recorded. Both real groups improved significantly more than sham in UPDRSIII (<italic>p</italic> = .010 and <italic>p</italic> = .045, respectively), while they did not significantly differ between them. Pooled real groups showed a significant improvement vs sham in UPDRSIII (<italic>p</italic> = .007), tremor (<italic>p</italic> = .011) and lateralized sub-scores (<italic>p</italic> = .042 and <italic>p</italic> = .012 for worse and better side, respectively). Timed tests significantly improved more in the real group vs sham on the worse side (HT <italic>p</italic> = .041, FT <italic>p</italic> = .012, NHPT <italic>p</italic> = .003). rDTMS with H-coil appeared safe and effective on motor symptoms as add-on treatment in PD.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical neurophysiology. Volume 126:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Clinical neurophysiology
- Issue:
- Volume 126:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 126, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 126
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0126-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- e20
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-01
- Subjects:
- Neurophysiology -- Periodicals
Electroencephalography -- Periodicals
Electromyography -- Periodicals
Neurology -- Periodicals
612.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13882457 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.104 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1388-2457
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.310645
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4180.xml