Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17. Issue 11 (July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17. Issue 11 (July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17
- Authors:
- Brulé, S.Y.
Jonker, D.J.
Karapetis, C.S.
O'Callaghan, C.J.
Moore, M.J.
Wong, R.
Tebbutt, N.C.
Underhill, Cr.
Yip, D.
Zalcberg, J.R.
Tu, D.
Goodwin, R.A. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st010">Background</title> <p id="sp0005">Right- and left-sided colon cancers (RC, LC) differ with respect to biology, pathology and epidemiology. Previous data suggest a mortality difference between RC and LC. We examined if primary tumour side also predicts for outcome in chemotherapy refractory, metastatic colon cancer (MCC). We also compared RC versus LC as a predictor of efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition with cetuximab.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st015">Methods</title> <p id="sp0010">Reanalyzing NCIC CO.17 trial (cetuximab versus best supportive care [BSC]), we coded the primary tumour side as RC (caecum to transverse colon) or LC (splenic flexure to rectosigmoid). The association between tumour side and baseline characteristics was assessed. Cox regression models determined factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Patients with RC (150/399) had more poorly differentiated, mutant <italic>KRAS, </italic> mutated <italic>PIK3CA</italic> and wild-type <italic>BRAF</italic> tumours, fewer liver and lung metastases, and shorter interval between diagnosis and study entry. Among BSC patients, tumour side was not prognostic for PFS (hazard ratios (HR) 1.07 [0.79–1.44], <italic>p</italic> = 0.67) or OS (HR 0.96 [0.70–1.31],<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st010">Background</title> <p id="sp0005">Right- and left-sided colon cancers (RC, LC) differ with respect to biology, pathology and epidemiology. Previous data suggest a mortality difference between RC and LC. We examined if primary tumour side also predicts for outcome in chemotherapy refractory, metastatic colon cancer (MCC). We also compared RC versus LC as a predictor of efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition with cetuximab.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st015">Methods</title> <p id="sp0010">Reanalyzing NCIC CO.17 trial (cetuximab versus best supportive care [BSC]), we coded the primary tumour side as RC (caecum to transverse colon) or LC (splenic flexure to rectosigmoid). The association between tumour side and baseline characteristics was assessed. Cox regression models determined factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Patients with RC (150/399) had more poorly differentiated, mutant <italic>KRAS, </italic> mutated <italic>PIK3CA</italic> and wild-type <italic>BRAF</italic> tumours, fewer liver and lung metastases, and shorter interval between diagnosis and study entry. Among BSC patients, tumour side was not prognostic for PFS (hazard ratios (HR) 1.07 [0.79–1.44], <italic>p</italic> = 0.67) or OS (HR 0.96 [0.70–1.31], <italic>p</italic> = 0.78). Among wild-type <italic>KRAS</italic> patients, those with LC had significantly improved PFS when treated with cetuximab compared to BSC (median 5.4 versus 1.8 months, HR 0.28 [0.18–0.45], <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001), whereas those with RC did not (median 1.9 versus 1.9 months, HR 0.73 [0.42–1.27], <italic>p</italic> = 0.26), [interaction <italic>p</italic> = 0.002].</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st025">Conclusion</title> <p id="sp0020">In refractory MCC, tumour location within the colon is not prognostic, but is strongly predictive of PFS benefit from cetuximab therapy. Additional research is needed to understand the molecular differences between RC and LC and their interaction with EGFR inhibition.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cancer. Volume 51:Issue 11(2015:Jul.)
- Journal:
- European journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 51:Issue 11(2015:Jul.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 51, Issue 11 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0051-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1405
- Page End:
- 1414
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancer
Tumors
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09598049 ↗
http://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/warpto.phtml?colors=7&jour_id=2879 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-8049
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3187.xml