Comparison of explicit finite element and mechanical simulation of the proximal femur during dynamic drop-tower testing. Issue 2 (21st January 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of explicit finite element and mechanical simulation of the proximal femur during dynamic drop-tower testing. Issue 2 (21st January 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of explicit finite element and mechanical simulation of the proximal femur during dynamic drop-tower testing
- Authors:
- Ariza, O.
Gilchrist, S.
Widmer, R.P.
Guy, P.
Ferguson, S.J.
Cripton, P.A.
Helgason, B. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="sp0065">Current screening techniques based on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurements are unable to identify the majority of people who sustain hip fractures. Biomechanical examination of such events may help determine what predisposes a hip to be susceptible to fracture. Recently, drop-tower simulations of in-vitro sideways falls have allowed the study of the mechanical response of the proximal human femur at realistic impact speeds. This technique has created an opportunity to validate explicit finite element (FE) models against dynamic test data. This study compared the outcomes of 15 human femoral specimens fractured using a drop tower with complementary specimen-specific explicit FE analysis. Correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) were found to be moderate for whole bone stiffness comparison (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>=0.3476 and 22.85% respectively). No correlation was found between experimentally and computationally predicted peak force, however, energy absorption comparison produced moderate correlation and RMSE (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>=0.4781 and 29.14% respectively). By comparing predicted strain maps to high speed video data we demonstrated the ability of the FE models to detect vulnerable portions of the bones. Based on our observations, we conclude that there exists a need to extend the current apparent level material models for<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="sp0065">Current screening techniques based on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurements are unable to identify the majority of people who sustain hip fractures. Biomechanical examination of such events may help determine what predisposes a hip to be susceptible to fracture. Recently, drop-tower simulations of in-vitro sideways falls have allowed the study of the mechanical response of the proximal human femur at realistic impact speeds. This technique has created an opportunity to validate explicit finite element (FE) models against dynamic test data. This study compared the outcomes of 15 human femoral specimens fractured using a drop tower with complementary specimen-specific explicit FE analysis. Correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) were found to be moderate for whole bone stiffness comparison (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>=0.3476 and 22.85% respectively). No correlation was found between experimentally and computationally predicted peak force, however, energy absorption comparison produced moderate correlation and RMSE (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>=0.4781 and 29.14% respectively). By comparing predicted strain maps to high speed video data we demonstrated the ability of the FE models to detect vulnerable portions of the bones. Based on our observations, we conclude that there exists a need to extend the current apparent level material models for bone to cover higher strain rates than previously tested experimentally.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of biomechanics. Volume 48:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of biomechanics
- Issue:
- Volume 48:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 48, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0048-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 224
- Page End:
- 232
- Publication Date:
- 2015-01-21
- Subjects:
- Animal mechanics -- Periodicals
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Mécanique animale -- Périodiques
Biomécanique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
571.4305 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00219290 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219290 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219290 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.042 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0021-9290
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4953.600000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4011.xml