Variable effect of playback of chickadee mobbing calls on detection probability of boreal forest birds. Issue 1 (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rae, Lauren F.; Whitaker, Darroch M.; Warkentin, Ian G.
• Is Part Of: Journal of field ornithology. Volume 86:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 51
• Page End: 64
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: Birds -- Periodicals; Ornithology -- Periodicals; Ornithologie -- Périodiques; Oiseaux -- Baguage -- Périodiques; Oiseaux -- Périodiques; 598
• DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12088
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0273-8570

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>Modification of the point count survey method to include playback of songbird mobbing calls in an attempt to increase detection probabilities has met with mixed success. We compared detection probabilities for boreal forest songbirds using traditional point count methods and counts using broadcasts of the mobbing calls of Black‐capped Chickadees (<italic>Poecile atricapillus</italic>) in an attempt to increase detection probability. We conducted 594 point counts during the 2010 breeding season in Newfoundland, Canada. Each point count consisted of an 8‐min silent observation period followed by an 8‐min broadcast of Black‐capped Chickadee mobbing calls. Occupancy model results showed that response to playback broadcast varied across species, with detection probabilities higher for seven of 17 species during the silent portions of point counts and three species more likely to be detected during playback intervals. For all species, the number of visual detections increased during periods of playback and, averaged across species, individuals were >6 times more likely to be seen during the playback period than during the silent period. Differences in detection probability among observers were apparent during both silent and playback periods. We suggest that using playback of chickadee mobbing calls during point count surveys of common boreal forest songbird species may be most beneficial when visual detection is important. However, playback may also be useful for species‐specific surveys during periods when birds are less likely to be vocal or for studies of less common species with chronically low detection probabilities. A combined silent and playback approach could also be useful, although observer and species differences should be accounted for if comparing data across species or studies.</p> </abstract>