IDENTIFYING AND SELECTING NEW PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A DECADE OF NICE EXPERIENCE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. (21st November 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- IDENTIFYING AND SELECTING NEW PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A DECADE OF NICE EXPERIENCE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. (21st November 2014)
- Main Title:
- IDENTIFYING AND SELECTING NEW PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A DECADE OF NICE EXPERIENCE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
- Authors:
- Campbell, Bruce
Morris, Rebekah
Mandava, Lakshmi
Murthy, Lakshmi
Gallo, Helen
Ong, Koh Jun
Latif, Ali
Patrick, Hannah - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <bold>Objectives:</bold> The aim of this study was to analyze the experience of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in identifying new procedures entering the United Kingdom (UK) healthcare system, for assessment and publication of recommendations on their use. This system is designed to provide guidance in an area where regulation is lacking worldwide.</p> <p> <bold>Methods:</bold> Retrospective analysis of all procedures notified to the Interventional Procedures Programme (NICE) between 2002 and 2012. Notifications were analyzed year by year for their source (who notified them), clinical specialties involved, and whether guidance was subsequently published.</p> <p> <bold>Results:</bold> A total of 1, 094 procedures were notified by clinicians (51 percent), and by others, including hospitals (6 percent), horizon scanners (5 percent), patients (4 percent), private health insurers (4 percent), and medical device manufacturers (3 percent). Guidance was published on 44 percent of procedures notified to the program. There was a decrease in the numbers of procedures notified during 2003–2012 (<italic>p</italic> = .049). There were notifications across all specialties, with the largest numbers in general surgery (125), urology (104), orthopedics (99), interventional radiology (93), cardiology (82), and obstetrics and gynecology (82).</p> <p><abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <bold>Objectives:</bold> The aim of this study was to analyze the experience of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in identifying new procedures entering the United Kingdom (UK) healthcare system, for assessment and publication of recommendations on their use. This system is designed to provide guidance in an area where regulation is lacking worldwide.</p> <p> <bold>Methods:</bold> Retrospective analysis of all procedures notified to the Interventional Procedures Programme (NICE) between 2002 and 2012. Notifications were analyzed year by year for their source (who notified them), clinical specialties involved, and whether guidance was subsequently published.</p> <p> <bold>Results:</bold> A total of 1, 094 procedures were notified by clinicians (51 percent), and by others, including hospitals (6 percent), horizon scanners (5 percent), patients (4 percent), private health insurers (4 percent), and medical device manufacturers (3 percent). Guidance was published on 44 percent of procedures notified to the program. There was a decrease in the numbers of procedures notified during 2003–2012 (<italic>p</italic> = .049). There were notifications across all specialties, with the largest numbers in general surgery (125), urology (104), orthopedics (99), interventional radiology (93), cardiology (82), and obstetrics and gynecology (82).</p> <p> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The "open" NICE Web portal allows anyone to notify new procedures, aiming to maximize the opportunity of identifying all those procedures entering clinical practice. This has resulted in identification of large numbers of procedures from across the whole range of medical specialties. The fact that similar proportions of procedures notified from diverse sources have been selected for assessment and publication of practice recommendations suggests that this inclusive approach is worthwhile.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of technology assessment in health care. Volume30:Number 4(2014:Oct.)
- Journal:
- International journal of technology assessment in health care
- Issue:
- Volume30:Number 4(2014:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0030-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 454
- Page End:
- 460
- Publication Date:
- 2014-11-21
- Subjects:
- Medical technology -- Periodicals
Technology assessment -- Periodicals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=THC ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1017/S0266462314000415 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0266-4623
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 3294.xml