A Pilot Study to Assess Benefit of Atrial Rhythm Control after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Atrioventricular Node Ablation. Issue 2 (27th November 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Pilot Study to Assess Benefit of Atrial Rhythm Control after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Atrioventricular Node Ablation. Issue 2 (27th November 2014)
- Main Title:
- A Pilot Study to Assess Benefit of Atrial Rhythm Control after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Atrioventricular Node Ablation
- Authors:
- SCHWARTZMAN, DAVID
HOUSEL, DEBRA
BAZAZ, RAVEEN
JAIN, SANDEEP
SABA, SAMIR
GORCSAN, JOHN
ADELSTEIN, EVAN - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="pace12535-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently comorbid in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and suppression is typically difficult. Herein, we sought to understand the benefit of atrial rhythm control in the setting of ventricular rate and regularity control induced by atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation.</p> </sec> <sec id="pace12535-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Fifty‐two patients with heart failure, persistent AF, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction &lt;35%, and left bundle branch block underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) + AVN ablation, and were randomized to one of the following groups: (1) Atrial Rhythm Control (ARC); (2) AF. Patients were subsequently followed for up to 1 year.</p> </sec> <sec id="pace12535-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Similar numbers of patients in each group were lost to follow‐up or have withdrawn (ARC two; AF three). Rhythm control in four patients in the ARC group was inadequate. Among the remaining patients, the incidence of death (ARC=1, AF=2) or left ventricular assist device +/− transplantation (ARC=2, AF=1) were similar. Among the remaining patients (ARC 16, AF 19), at 1 year, there were no significant differences in CRT response rate, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure survey score,<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="pace12535-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently comorbid in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and suppression is typically difficult. Herein, we sought to understand the benefit of atrial rhythm control in the setting of ventricular rate and regularity control induced by atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation.</p> </sec> <sec id="pace12535-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Fifty‐two patients with heart failure, persistent AF, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction &lt;35%, and left bundle branch block underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) + AVN ablation, and were randomized to one of the following groups: (1) Atrial Rhythm Control (ARC); (2) AF. Patients were subsequently followed for up to 1 year.</p> </sec> <sec id="pace12535-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Similar numbers of patients in each group were lost to follow‐up or have withdrawn (ARC two; AF three). Rhythm control in four patients in the ARC group was inadequate. Among the remaining patients, the incidence of death (ARC=1, AF=2) or left ventricular assist device +/− transplantation (ARC=2, AF=1) were similar. Among the remaining patients (ARC 16, AF 19), at 1 year, there were no significant differences in CRT response rate, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure survey score, 6‐minute hall walk distance, ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurrence, or LV dimensions. A significantly higher hospital encounter rate among ARC patients was attributable to efforts to maintain uniform atrial rhythm.</p> </sec> <sec id="pace12535-sec-0040" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>In this pilot study, no incremental benefit for ARC was apparent. A larger study will be necessary to adequately examine these issues.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pacing and clinical electrophysiology. Volume 38:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
- Issue:
- Volume 38:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0038-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 275
- Page End:
- 281
- Publication Date:
- 2014-11-27
- Subjects:
- Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals
Electrophysiology -- Periodicals
617.4120645 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-8159 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/rd.asp?goto=journal&code=pace ↗
http://www.futuraco.com/journalsf.htm ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0147-8389;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/pace.12535 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0147-8389
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6328.210000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3301.xml