The effectiveness of age on HbA1c as a criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes in Chinese different age subjects. (12th June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Liyong; Shen, Ximei; Yan, Sunjie; Xu, Feipeng; Wu, Peiwen
• Is Part Of: Clinical endocrinology. Volume 82:Number 2(2015:Feb.)
• Page Start: 205
• Page End: 212
• Publication Date: 2014-06-12
• Subjects: Endocrinology -- Periodicals; 616.4005
• DOI: 10.1111/cen.12494
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-0664

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="cen12494-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="cen12494-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To analyse the effectiveness of age on HbA1c as a criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes in Chinese different age subjects.</p> </sec> <sec id="cen12494-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This retrospective study enrolled a total of 1147 outpatients with untreated newly diagnosed diabetes (aged 18–80 years, 42·55% women) from the Fujian Province, China, and 427 age and gender‐matched (control) subjects without diabetes. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to determine the performance of HbA1c against results of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed at the same time according to specific age groups. The ORs and 95%CIs between diabetes and other metabolic disorders were analysed.</p> </sec> <sec id="cen12494-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>(i) HbA1c provided an age‐specific diagnosis for diabetes: there was a high diagnostic titter of HbA1c in the 18‐ to 39‐year age group; conversely, there was a low diagnostic titter of HbA1c in the ≥70‐year‐old age groups. (ii) After adjusted for age, individuals with diabetes by OGTT criteria but not by WHO HbA1c criteria had an increased chance of having abnormal weight, hypertriglyceridaemia, HDL hypocholesterolaemia and insulin resistance. (iii) The diagnostic cut‐off points of HbA1c for diabetes in different age groups (18–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and ≥70 years) were 6·1, 6·3, 6·4, 6·5 and 6·4, respectively. The age‐specific HbA1c criteria exhibited the higher positive rate, sensitivity and lower false‐negative rate when compared with WHO HbA1c criteria.</p> </sec> <sec id="cen12494-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>This provided evidence indicating that there may be drawbacks in the use of HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes. Thus, we proposed that the impact of introducing HbA1c for diabetes diagnosis should be considered in terms of age. Cohort studies are needed to further confirm the suitability of age‐specific HbA1c criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes.</p> </sec> </abstract>