Evaluating Area‐Based Socioeconomic Status Indicators for Monitoring Disparities within Health Care Systems: Results from a Primary Care Network. (15th September 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Berkowitz, Seth A.; Traore, Carine Y.; Singer, Daniel E.; Atlas, Steven J.
• Is Part Of: Health services research. Volume 50:Number 2(2015)
• Page Start: 398
• Page End: 417
• Publication Date: 2014-09-15
• Subjects: Medical care -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Hospital care -- Periodicals; Health services administration -- Periodicals; 362
• DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12229
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-9124

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="hesr12229-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="hesr12229-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To determine which area‐based socioeconomic status (SES) indicator is best suited to monitor health care disparities from a delivery system perspective.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12229-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Data Sources/Study Setting</title> <p>142, 659 adults seen in a primary care network from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12229-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Study Design</title> <p>Cross‐sectional, comparing associations between area‐based SES indicators and patient outcomes.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12229-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Data Collection</title> <p>Address data were geocoded to construct area‐based SES indicators at block group (BG), census tract (CT), and ZIP code (ZIP) levels. Data on health outcomes were abstracted from electronic records. Relative indices of inequality (RIIs) were calculated to quantify disparities detected by area‐based SES indicators and compared to RIIs from self‐reported educational attainment.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12229-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Principal Findings</title> <p>ZIP indicators had less missing data than BG or CT indicators (<italic>p</italic> < .0001). Area‐based SES indicators were strongly associated with self‐report educational attainment (<italic>p</italic> < .0001). ZIP, BG, and CT indicators all detected expected SES gradients in health outcomes similarly. Single‐item, cut point defined indicators performed as well as multidimensional indices and quantile indicators.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12229-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Area‐based SES indicators detected health outcome differences well and may be useful for monitoring disparities within health care systems. Our preferred indicator was ZIP‐level median household income or percent poverty, using cut points.</p> </sec> </abstract>