Choosing the Best House in a Bad Neighborhood: Location Strategies of Human Rights INGOs in the Non‐Western World1. Issue 1 (15th December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barry, Colin M.; Bell, Sam R.; Clay, K. Chad; Flynn, Michael E.; Murdie, Amanda
• Is Part Of: International studies quarterly. Volume 59:Issue 1(2015:Mar.)
• Page Start: 86
• Page End: 98
• Publication Date: 2014-12-15
• Subjects: International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 303.482
• DOI: 10.1111/isqu.12172
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-8833

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="isqu12172-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>What determines the location of those human rights international non‐governmental organization (INGO) resources found outside of the highly developed Western democracies? We draw a distinction between the bottom‐up mobilization processes driving the location of human rights organization (HRO) <italic>members</italic> from the top‐down strategic concerns driving where HRO leaders place permanent <italic>offices</italic>. In particular, we find that, while political opportunity structures generally increase the likelihood that a state has HRO members, it has a curvilinear influence on the number of HRO secretariats, which typically locate in areas seen as having a higher need for organizational resources. Further, while there is no clear connection between human rights abuses and HRO memberships in a state, HROs' strategic concerns lead them to place offices with reference to both local and neighborhood "need"—in other words, levels of repression.</p> </abstract>