Emergency Department Quality Improvement Activity: An Inventory From the American Board of Emergency Medicine Maintenance of Certification Program. (25th February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kowalenko, Terry; Carius, Michael L.; Korte, Robert C.; Miller, Michele C.; Reisdorff, Earl J.; Burton, John
• Is Part Of: Academic emergency medicine. Volume 22:Number 3(2015:Mar.)
• Page Start: 367
• Page End: 372
• Publication Date: 2015-02-25
• Subjects: Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1111/acem.12597
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1069-6563

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="acem12597-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="acem12597-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program requires every ABEM‐certified physician to attest to participating in a quality improvement (QI) activity every 5 years. Understanding the type and frequency of these QI activities could inform the emergency medicine community about the variety of QI activities in which emergency physicians (EPs) are involved. These QI activities could provide ideas for the development of additional quality measures.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12597-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This was a retrospective descriptive study of self‐reported QI activity attestations from the ABEM MOC program during 2013. Attestations were provided by ABEM‐certified EPs using the ABEM MOC website. The type, number, and cumulative frequency of activities are reported.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12597-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>ABEM received 9, 380 attestations for QI activities in 91 different categories. The three most commonly reported activities were acute myocardial infarction‐percutaneous coronary intervention within 90 minutes of arrival (includes door‐to‐balloon time), door‐to‐doctor times, and throughput time measures. These three activities comprised 36.4% of attestations. More than half (54.4%) of the attestations were captured by the five most frequently attested activities, 67.1% by the top seven categories, and 89.9% by the top 21 categories. Of these 21 categories, 10 involved clinical protocols, nine were time‐centered measures, and two were patient‐centered activities.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12597-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>This report demonstrates that diverse QI activities occur in emergency departments (EDs) across the United States. The majority of reported projects are nested in a few categories, following recognized areas of emphasis in emergency care, particularly in areas using time‐sensitive metrics.</p> </sec> </abstract>