A mixed‐methods examination of communication between oncologists and primary care providers among primary care physicians in underserved communities. Issue 6 (6th November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shen, Megan Johnson; Binz‐Scharf, Maria; D'Agostino, Tom; Blakeney, Natasha; Weiss, Elisa; Michaels, Margo; Patel, Shilpa; McKee, M. Diane; Bylund, Carma L.
• Is Part Of: Cancer. Volume 121:Issue 6(2015)
• Page Start: 908
• Page End: 915
• Publication Date: 2014-11-06
• Subjects: Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29131
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-543X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="cncr29131-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Research has demonstrated that communication and care coordination improve cancer patient outcomes. To improve communication and care coordination, it is important to understand primary care providers' (PCPs') perceptions of communication with oncologists as well as PCPs' communication needs.</p> </sec> <sec id="cncr29131-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>METHODS</title> <p>A mixed‐methods approach was used in the present study. In the qualitative phase of the study, 18 PCPs practicing in underserved, minority communities were interviewed about their experiences communicating with oncologists. In the quantitative phase of the study, 128 PCPs completed an online survey about their preferences, experiences, and satisfaction with communication with oncologists.</p> </sec> <sec id="cncr29131-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>Results indicated a PCP‐oncologist gap in communication occurred between diagnosis and treatment. PCPs wanted more communication with oncologists, updates on their patients' prognosis throughout treatment, and to be contacted via telephone or email and saw their role as crucial in providing supportive care for their patients.</p> </sec> <sec id="cncr29131-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> <p>Although PCPs recognize that they play a critical, proactive role in supporting patients throughout the continuum of their cancer care experience, existing norms regarding postreferral engagement and oncologist‐PCP communication often hinder activation of this role among PCPs. Expected standards regarding the method, frequency, and quality of postreferral communication should be jointly articulated and made accountable between PCPs and oncologists to help improve cancer patients' quality of care, particularly in minority communities. <bold><italic>Cancer</italic> 2015;121:908–915.</bold> © <italic>2014 American Cancer Society</italic>.</p> </sec> </abstract>