A multilevel analysis of fruit growth of two tomato cultivars in response to fruit temperature. Issue 3 (5th August 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Okello, Robert C. O.; de Visser, Pieter H. B.; Heuvelink, Ep; Lammers, Michiel; de Maagd, Ruud A.; Struik, Paul C.; Marcelis, Leo F. M.
• Is Part Of: Physiologia plantarum. Volume 153:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
• Page Start: 403
• Page End: 418
• Publication Date: 2014-08-05
• Subjects: Plant physiology -- Periodicals; 571.2
• DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12247
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9317

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ppl12247-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p id="ppl12247-para-0001">Fruit phenotype is a resultant of inherent genetic potential in interaction with impact of environment experienced during crop and fruit growth. The aim of this study was to analyze the genetic and physiological basis for the difference in fruit size between a small ('Brioso') and intermediate ('Cappricia') sized tomato cultivar exposed to different fruit temperatures. It was hypothesized that fruit heating enhances expression of cell cycle and expansion genes, rates of carbon import, cell division and expansion, and shortens growth duration, whereas increase in cell number intensifies competition for assimilates among cells. Unlike previous studies in which whole‐plant and fruit responses cannot be separated, we investigated the temperature response by varying fruit temperature using climate‐controlled cuvettes, while keeping plant temperature the same. Fruit phenotype was assessed at different levels of aggregation (whole fruit, cell and gene) between anthesis and breaker stage. We showed that: (1) final fruit fresh weight was larger in 'Cappricia' owing to more and larger pericarp cells, (2) heated fruits were smaller because their mesocarp cells were smaller than those of control fruits and (3) no significant differences in pericarp carbohydrate concentration were detected between heated and control fruits nor between cultivars at breaker stage. At the gene level, expression of cell division promoters (<italic>CDKB2</italic>, <italic>CycA1</italic> and <italic>E2Fe‐like</italic>) was higher while that of the inhibitory <italic>fw2</italic>.2 was lower in 'Cappricia'. Fruit heating increased expression of <italic>fw2.2</italic> and three cell division promoters (<italic>CDKB1</italic>, <italic>CDKB2</italic> and <italic>CycA1</italic>). Expression of cell expansion genes did not corroborate cell size observations.</p> </abstract>