Is Preoperative Pain Duration Important in Spinal Cord Stimulation? A Comparison Between Tonic and Burst Stimulation. Issue 1 (21st October 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Is Preoperative Pain Duration Important in Spinal Cord Stimulation? A Comparison Between Tonic and Burst Stimulation. Issue 1 (21st October 2014)
- Main Title:
- Is Preoperative Pain Duration Important in Spinal Cord Stimulation? A Comparison Between Tonic and Burst Stimulation
- Authors:
- De Ridder, Dirk
Vancamp, Tim
Lenders, Mathieu W.P.M.
De Vos, Cecile C.
Vanneste, Sven - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ner12253-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>Conflicting data have been published as to whether the success rate of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is inversely proportional to the time interval from the initial onset of symptoms to implantation. Recently, a new stimulation design called burst stimulation has been developed that seems to exert its effect by modulating both the medial and lateral pain pathways and has a better effect than tonic stimulation on global pain, back pain, and limb pain.</p> </sec> <sec id="ner12253-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods</title> <p>We analyzed the effect of preoperative pain duration on the degree of pain suppression by both tonic and burst stimulation in a group of patients (<italic>n</italic> = 49) who underwent both tonic and burst SCS.</p> </sec> <sec id="ner12253-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Using Pearson correlation analysis and controlling for age and duration of SCS, no correlation could be found between the preoperative pain duration and the success of SCS, either for tonic or for burst SCS, as defined by a numeric rating scale for pain. Using a different analysis method, dividing patients into groups according to preoperative pain duration, the same absence of influence was found. Pain was better suppressed by burst stimulation than tonic stimulation, irrespective<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ner12253-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>Conflicting data have been published as to whether the success rate of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is inversely proportional to the time interval from the initial onset of symptoms to implantation. Recently, a new stimulation design called burst stimulation has been developed that seems to exert its effect by modulating both the medial and lateral pain pathways and has a better effect than tonic stimulation on global pain, back pain, and limb pain.</p> </sec> <sec id="ner12253-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods</title> <p>We analyzed the effect of preoperative pain duration on the degree of pain suppression by both tonic and burst stimulation in a group of patients (<italic>n</italic> = 49) who underwent both tonic and burst SCS.</p> </sec> <sec id="ner12253-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Using Pearson correlation analysis and controlling for age and duration of SCS, no correlation could be found between the preoperative pain duration and the success of SCS, either for tonic or for burst SCS, as defined by a numeric rating scale for pain. Using a different analysis method, dividing patients into groups according to preoperative pain duration, the same absence of influence was found. Pain was better suppressed by burst stimulation than tonic stimulation, irrespective of the preoperative pain duration.</p> </sec> <sec id="ner12253-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>These results suggest that the duration of pain is not an exclusion criterion for SCS and that similar success rates can be obtained for longstanding pain and pain of more recent onset.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuromodulaton. Volume 18:Issue 1(2015:Jan./Feb.)
- Journal:
- Neuromodulaton
- Issue:
- Volume 18:Issue 1(2015:Jan./Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 18, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0018-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 13
- Page End:
- 17
- Publication Date:
- 2014-10-21
- Subjects:
- Central nervous system -- Physiology -- Periodicals
Central nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1525-1403 ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/neuromodulation-technology-at-the-neural-interface ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ner.12253 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1094-7159
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.504100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3606.xml