Robson Ten Group Classification System Applied to Women with Severe Maternal Morbidity. Issue 1 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Robson Ten Group Classification System Applied to Women with Severe Maternal Morbidity. Issue 1 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Robson Ten Group Classification System Applied to Women with Severe Maternal Morbidity
- Authors:
- Ferreira, Elton Carlos
Costa, Maria Laura
Cecatti, José Guilherme
Haddad, Samira M.
Parpinelli, Mary Angela
Robson, Michael S.
the Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity Study Group - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="birt12155-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="birt12155-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To evaluate the distribution of women with severe maternal morbidity according to Robson Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS).</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12155-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Secondary analysis of a multicenter cross‐sectional study in 27 obstetric units in Brazil, using RTGCS. Cases were classified into potentially life‐threatening condition or a maternal near miss or death, according to severity. Certain groups were subdivided for further analysis. Cesarean delivery (CD) rates were reported.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12155-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Among 7, 247 women with severe maternal morbidity, 73.2 percent underwent CD. Group 10 (single, cephalic, preterm) was the most prevalent (33.9%). Groups mostly associated with a severe maternal outcome were: 7 (multiparous, breech), 9 (all abnormal lies, single, term), 8 (all multiple), and 10. Groups 1 (nulliparous, single, cephalic, term, spontaneous) and 3 (multiparous, single, cephalic, term, spontaneous) were associated with better maternal outcome. Group 3 had one severe maternal morbidity to 29 cases of potentially life‐threatening, but the ratio was 1:10 for women undergoing CD, indicating a worse outcome. Group 4a (multiparous, no previous CD, single, cephalic, term, induced labor) had a better<abstract abstract-type="main" id="birt12155-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="birt12155-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To evaluate the distribution of women with severe maternal morbidity according to Robson Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS).</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12155-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Secondary analysis of a multicenter cross‐sectional study in 27 obstetric units in Brazil, using RTGCS. Cases were classified into potentially life‐threatening condition or a maternal near miss or death, according to severity. Certain groups were subdivided for further analysis. Cesarean delivery (CD) rates were reported.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12155-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Among 7, 247 women with severe maternal morbidity, 73.2 percent underwent CD. Group 10 (single, cephalic, preterm) was the most prevalent (33.9%). Groups mostly associated with a severe maternal outcome were: 7 (multiparous, breech), 9 (all abnormal lies, single, term), 8 (all multiple), and 10. Groups 1 (nulliparous, single, cephalic, term, spontaneous) and 3 (multiparous, single, cephalic, term, spontaneous) were associated with better maternal outcome. Group 3 had one severe maternal morbidity to 29 cases of potentially life‐threatening, but the ratio was 1:10 for women undergoing CD, indicating a worse outcome. Group 4a (multiparous, no previous CD, single, cephalic, term, induced labor) had a better maternal outcome than those delivered by CD before labor (group 4b). Hypertension was the most common condition of severity.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12155-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The RTGCS was useful to consider severe maternal morbidity, showing groups with higher CD rates and worse maternal outcomes.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Birth. Volume 42:Issue 1(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Birth
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Issue 1(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0042-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 38
- Page End:
- 47
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Childbirth -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Newborn infants -- Care -- Periodicals
Natural childbirth -- Periodicals
618.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1523-536X ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=bir ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118533571/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/birt.12155 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0730-7659
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2094.081000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4158.xml