Linking niche theory to ecological impacts of successful invaders: insights from resource fluctuation‐specialist herbivore interactions. (15th November 2014) - Gidoin, Cindy
Summary Theories of species coexistence and invasion ecology are fundamentally connected and provide a common theoretical framework for studying the mechanisms underlying successful invasions and their ecological impacts. Temporal fluctuations in resource availability and differences in life‐history traits between invasive and resident species are considered as likely drivers of the dynamics of invaded communities. Current critical issues in invasion ecology thus relate to the extent to which such mechanisms influence coexistence between invasive and resident species and to the ability of resident species to persist in an invasive‐dominated ecosystem. We tested how a fluctuating resource, and species trait differences may explain and help predict long‐term impacts of biological invasions in forest specialist insect communities. We used a simple invasion system comprising closely related invasive and resident seed‐specialized wasps (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) competing for a well‐known fluctuating resource and displaying divergent diapause, reproductive and phenological traits. Based on extensive long‐term field observations (1977–2010), we developed a combination of mechanistic and statistical models aiming to (i) obtain a realistic description of the population dynamics of these interacting species over time, and (ii) clarify the respective contributions of fluctuation‐dependent and fluctuation‐independent mechanisms to long‐term impact of invasion on the population dynamics of the resident wasp species. We showed that a fluctuation‐dependent mechanism was unable to promote coexistence of the resident and invasive species. Earlier phenology of the invasive species was the main driver of invasion success, enabling the invader to exploit an empty niche. Phenology also had the greatest power to explain the long‐term negative impact of the invasive on the resident species, through resource pre‐emption. This study provides strong support for the critical role of species differences in interspecific competition outcomes within animal communities. Our mechanistic‐statistical approach disentangles the critical drivers of novel species assemblages resulting from intentional and non‐intentional introductions of non‐native species.