Introduction of laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Issue 4 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Introduction of laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Issue 4 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Introduction of laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
- Authors:
- Howard, A. Q.
Bennett, P. C.
Ahmad, I.
Choksy, S. A.
Mackenzie, S. I. P.
Backhouse, C. M. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9714-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="bjs9714-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9714-para-0001">The aim was to review a consecutive series of patients treated with laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. These patients were compared with patients having elective open AAA repair.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9714-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9714-para-0002">Demographic and operative details were collected prospectively and outcomes recorded for all patients undergoing laparoscopic or open AAA repair.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9714-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9714-para-0003">A total of 316 patients underwent laparoscopic (51), open (53) or endovascular (EVAR; 212) AAA repair between 2007 and 2013. The median age of patients who had laparoscopic or open repair was 72 (i.q.r. 66–75) years, and 92·3 per cent were men. There was no significant difference in sex distribution, age or V‐POSSUM physiology score between laparoscopic and open repair. Of the 51 laparoscopic procedures, six were totally laparoscopic, 43 were laparoscopically assisted and two were converted to open repair. Pain scores were similar on days 1 and 3 after laparoscopic and open repair, even though epidurals were used in the open group, and were lower on days 5 and 7 after laparoscopic procedures. Patients who had laparoscopic<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9714-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="bjs9714-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9714-para-0001">The aim was to review a consecutive series of patients treated with laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. These patients were compared with patients having elective open AAA repair.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9714-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9714-para-0002">Demographic and operative details were collected prospectively and outcomes recorded for all patients undergoing laparoscopic or open AAA repair.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9714-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9714-para-0003">A total of 316 patients underwent laparoscopic (51), open (53) or endovascular (EVAR; 212) AAA repair between 2007 and 2013. The median age of patients who had laparoscopic or open repair was 72 (i.q.r. 66–75) years, and 92·3 per cent were men. There was no significant difference in sex distribution, age or V‐POSSUM physiology score between laparoscopic and open repair. Of the 51 laparoscopic procedures, six were totally laparoscopic, 43 were laparoscopically assisted and two were converted to open repair. Pain scores were similar on days 1 and 3 after laparoscopic and open repair, even though epidurals were used in the open group, and were lower on days 5 and 7 after laparoscopic procedures. Patients who had laparoscopic repair had significantly fewer postoperative cardiorespiratory and renal complications (<italic>P</italic> = 0·017), and were discharged from hospital sooner (median 5 (i.q.r. 3–7) <italic>versus</italic> 8 (6–11) days; <italic>P</italic> = 0 ·001).</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9714-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p id="bjs9714-para-0004">Laparoscopic AAA repair was performed safely, and with at least equivalent outcomes to open repair, in patients unfavourable for EVAR.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 102:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0102-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 368
- Page End:
- 374
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.9714 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3428.xml