A cluster randomized controlled non‐inferiority trial of 5‐day Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) training delivered over 1 week versus 5‐day DAFNE training delivered over 5 weeks: the DAFNE 5 × 1‐day trial. Issue 3 (1st December 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A cluster randomized controlled non‐inferiority trial of 5‐day Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) training delivered over 1 week versus 5‐day DAFNE training delivered over 5 weeks: the DAFNE 5 × 1‐day trial. Issue 3 (1st December 2014)
- Main Title:
- A cluster randomized controlled non‐inferiority trial of 5‐day Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) training delivered over 1 week versus 5‐day DAFNE training delivered over 5 weeks: the DAFNE 5 × 1‐day trial
- Authors:
- Elliott, J.
Rankin, D.
Jacques, R. M.
Lawton, J.
Emery, C. J.
Campbell, M. J.
Dixon, S.
Heller, S. R.
the NIHR DAFNE Research Study Group - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="dme12621-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="dme12621-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aims</title> <p>To compare, in a randomized controlled non‐inferiority trial, the outcomes of the traditional format for Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating structured education courses; that is, one delivered over 5 consecutive days (1‐week course) with a variant of this format delivered 1 day a week for 5 consecutive weeks (5‐week course).</p> </sec> <sec id="dme12621-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Adults with Type 1 diabetes, from seven UK Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating training centres, were individually randomized, stratified by centre, to receive either a 1‐week or 5‐week course. A qualitative study was embedded within the trial to explore patients' experiences.</p> </sec> <sec id="dme12621-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In total, 213 patients were randomized and 160 completed the study procedures. In the per‐protocol analysis, the difference in HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels (95% CI) between the arms at 6 months was 0.4 mmol/mol (−2.4, 3.1) or 0.03% (−0.22, 0.28) and −0.9 mmol/mol (−3.9, 2.2) or −0.08% (−0.36, 0.20) at 12 months. All confidence limits were within the non‐inferiority margin of ± 5.5 mmol/mol (0.5%) for HbA<sub>1c</sub>%. For those patients with a baseline HbA<sub>1c</sub> of ≥ 58 mmol/mol (≥ 7.5%) the mean change (95% CI) in HbA<sub>1c</sub> was −2.2 mmol/mol (−4.0, −0.4) or<abstract abstract-type="main" id="dme12621-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="dme12621-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aims</title> <p>To compare, in a randomized controlled non‐inferiority trial, the outcomes of the traditional format for Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating structured education courses; that is, one delivered over 5 consecutive days (1‐week course) with a variant of this format delivered 1 day a week for 5 consecutive weeks (5‐week course).</p> </sec> <sec id="dme12621-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Adults with Type 1 diabetes, from seven UK Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating training centres, were individually randomized, stratified by centre, to receive either a 1‐week or 5‐week course. A qualitative study was embedded within the trial to explore patients' experiences.</p> </sec> <sec id="dme12621-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In total, 213 patients were randomized and 160 completed the study procedures. In the per‐protocol analysis, the difference in HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels (95% CI) between the arms at 6 months was 0.4 mmol/mol (−2.4, 3.1) or 0.03% (−0.22, 0.28) and −0.9 mmol/mol (−3.9, 2.2) or −0.08% (−0.36, 0.20) at 12 months. All confidence limits were within the non‐inferiority margin of ± 5.5 mmol/mol (0.5%) for HbA<sub>1c</sub>%. For those patients with a baseline HbA<sub>1c</sub> of ≥ 58 mmol/mol (≥ 7.5%) the mean change (95% CI) in HbA<sub>1c</sub> was −2.2 mmol/mol (−4.0, −0.4) or −0.20% (−0.37, −0.04) at 6 months (<italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.016), and −2.0 mmol/mol (−4.1, 0.04) or −0.18% (−0.37 to 0.004) at 12 months (<italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.055). Episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were decreased by 82% [relative risk 0.18 (95% CI 0.03–0.936); <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.042], psychosocial outcomes improved significantly, and the difference between arms was not significant. Qualitative interviews showed that patients overwhelmingly favoured the format of course that they attended.</p> </sec> <sec id="dme12621-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>In summary, 5‐week and 1‐week Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating courses are equivalent in terms of biomedical and psychosocial outcomes, and we were persuaded that both course formats should be made available in routine care.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Diabetic medicine. Volume 32:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Diabetic medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 32:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0032-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 391
- Page End:
- 398
- Publication Date:
- 2014-12-01
- Subjects:
- Diabetes -- Periodicals
616.462 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=dme ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/dme.12621 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0742-3071
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3579.606000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3723.xml