Toward quantification and source sector identification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from an urban area: Results from the INFLUX experiment. Issue 1 (12th January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Turnbull, Jocelyn C.; Sweeney, Colm; Karion, Anna; Newberger, Timothy; Lehman, Scott J.; Tans, Pieter P.; Davis, Kenneth J.; Lauvaux, Thomas; Miles, Natasha L.; Richardson, Scott J.; Cambaliza, Maria Obiminda; Shepson, Paul B.; Gurney, Kevin; Patarasuk, Risa; Razlivanov, Igor
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 120:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 292
• Page End: 312
• Publication Date: 2015-01-12
• Subjects: Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022555
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX) aims to develop and assess methods for quantifying urban greenhouse gas emissions. Here we use CO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub>, and CO measurements from tall towers around Indianapolis, USA, to determine urban total CO<sub>2</sub>, the fossil fuel derived CO<sub>2</sub> component (CO<sub>2</sub>ff), and CO enhancements relative to background measurements. When a local background directly upwind of the urban area is used, the wintertime total CO<sub>2</sub> enhancement over Indianapolis can be entirely explained by urban CO<sub>2</sub>ff emissions. Conversely, when a continental background is used, CO<sub>2</sub>ff enhancements are larger and account for only half the total CO<sub>2</sub> enhancement, effectively representing the combined CO<sub>2</sub>ff enhancement from Indianapolis and the wider region. In summer, we find that diurnal variability in both background CO<sub>2</sub> mole fraction and covarying vertical mixing makes it difficult to use a simple upwind‐downwind difference for a reliable determination of total CO<sub>2</sub> urban enhancement. We use characteristic CO<sub>2</sub>ff source sector CO:CO<sub>2</sub>ff emission ratios to examine the contribution of the CO<sub>2</sub>ff source sectors to total CO<sub>2</sub>ff emissions. This method is strongly sensitive to the mobile sector, which produces most CO. We show that the inventory‐based emission product ("bottom up") and atmospheric observations ("top down") can be directly compared throughout the diurnal cycle using this ratio method. For Indianapolis, the top‐down observations are consistent with the bottom‐up Hestia data product emission sector patterns for most of the diurnal cycle but disagree during the nighttime hours. Further examination of both the top‐down and bottom‐up assumptions is needed to assess the exact cause of the discrepancy.</p> </abstract>