Comprehensive study of emission source contributions for tropospheric ozone formation over East Asia. Issue 1 (14th January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Itahashi, Syuichi; Hayami, Hiroshi; Uno, Itsushi
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 120:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 331
• Page End: 358
• Publication Date: 2015-01-14
• Subjects: Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022117
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jgrd51901-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p id="jgrd51901-para-0001">Emission source contributions of tropospheric ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) were comprehensively investigated by using the higher‐order decoupled direct method (HDDM) for sensitivity analysis and the ozone source apportionment technology (OSAT) for mass balance analysis in the comprehensive air‐quality model with extensions (CAMx). The response of O<sub>3</sub> to emissions reductions at various levels in mainland China, Korea, and Japan were estimated and compared with results calculated by the brute force method (BFM) where one model parameter is varied at a time. Emissions were assessed at three receptor sites in Japan that experienced severe pollution events in May 2009. For emissions from China, HDDM assessed O<sub>3</sub> response with a bias of only up to 3 ppbv (a relative error of 4.5%) even for a 50% reduction but failed to assess a more extreme reduction. OSAT was reasonably accurate at 100% reduction, with a −4 ppbv (−7%) bias, but was less accurate at moderate ranges of reduction (∼50–70%). For emissions from Korea and Japan, HDDM captured the nonlinear response at all receptor sites and at all reduction levels to within 1% in all but one case; however, the bias of OSAT increased with the increasing reduction of emissions. One possible reason for this is that OSAT does not account for NO titration. To address this, a term for potential ozone (PO; O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> together) was introduced. Using of PO instead of O<sub>3</sub> improved the performance of OSAT, especially for emissions reductions from Korea and Japan. The proposed approach with PO refined the OSAT results and did not degrade HDDM performance.</p> </abstract>