Performance of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance compared with World Health Organization standards. (30th July 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Performance of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance compared with World Health Organization standards. (30th July 2014)
- Main Title:
- Performance of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance compared with World Health Organization standards
- Authors:
- Desai, Shalini
Smith, Tiffany
Thorley, Bruce R
Grenier, Danielle
Dickson, Nigel
Altpeter, Ekkehardt
SPSU Committee
Sabbe, Martine
Elliott, Elizabeth
Zurynski, Yvonne - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To compare acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance systems used by members of the International Network of Paediatric Surveillance Units (INoPSU) across the five AFP surveillance performance indicators recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the maintenance of polio‐free certification.</p> </sec> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A survey was administered to AFP surveillance co‐ordinators in five INoPSU member countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland). Data collected included information on surveillance system processes, WHO‐recommended performance indicators, investigative practices and final diagnoses of cases from 2006 to 2010.</p> </sec> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>All countries contacted completed the survey. Each country used similar case definitions and processes for collecting AFP data. All countries used at least one of the WHO indicators for surveillance. No country consistently met the performance indicator for incidence or stool sampling. In all countries, at least one form of neurological testing was used to diagnose cases of AFP. Guillain‐Barré syndrome was the most common final diagnosis in all countries for all years examined.</p> </sec> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0004"<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To compare acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance systems used by members of the International Network of Paediatric Surveillance Units (INoPSU) across the five AFP surveillance performance indicators recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the maintenance of polio‐free certification.</p> </sec> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A survey was administered to AFP surveillance co‐ordinators in five INoPSU member countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland). Data collected included information on surveillance system processes, WHO‐recommended performance indicators, investigative practices and final diagnoses of cases from 2006 to 2010.</p> </sec> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>All countries contacted completed the survey. Each country used similar case definitions and processes for collecting AFP data. All countries used at least one of the WHO indicators for surveillance. No country consistently met the performance indicator for incidence or stool sampling. In all countries, at least one form of neurological testing was used to diagnose cases of AFP. Guillain‐Barré syndrome was the most common final diagnosis in all countries for all years examined.</p> </sec> <sec id="jpc12691-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Industrialised countries surveyed do not consistently meet the WHO‐recommended AFP surveillance performance indicators. An opportunity exists for INoPSU to suggest a standard way for member countries to collect AFP data in order to examine the potential for strengthening the current systems or introducing additional enterovirus surveillance or alternative/complementary neurological performance measures suitable for countries that have eliminated polio. INoPSU member countries are evaluating these possibilities.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of paediatrics and child health. Volume 51:Number 2(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Journal of paediatrics and child health
- Issue:
- Volume 51:Number 2(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 51, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0051-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 209
- Page End:
- 214
- Publication Date:
- 2014-07-30
- Subjects:
- Children -- Health and hygiene -- Periodicals
Pediatrics -- Periodicals
618.92 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/aims.asp?ref=1034-4810&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jpc.12691 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1034-4810
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5027.778000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3591.xml