Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) with Standard Exhalation Valve Does Not Improve Maximum Exercise Capacity in Patients with COPD. (1st February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) with Standard Exhalation Valve Does Not Improve Maximum Exercise Capacity in Patients with COPD. (1st February 2015)
- Main Title:
- Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) with Standard Exhalation Valve Does Not Improve Maximum Exercise Capacity in Patients with COPD
- Authors:
- Moga, Ana Maria
de Marchie, Michel
Saey, Didier
Spahija, Jadranka - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold> <italic>Background:</italic> Although BiPAP has been used as an adjunct to exercise, little is know about its effect on exercise in COPD. We aimed to evaluate the acute effect of BiPAP delivered with a standard valve (Vision, Respironics), compared to no assist, on exercise capacity in individuals with COPD. <italic>Methods:</italic> Peak exercise workload (WL<sub>peak</sub>), dyspnea (Borg), end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>), minute ventilation (V<sub>E</sub>), O<sub>2</sub> uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), and CO<sub>2</sub> production (VCO<sub>2</sub>) were assessed in 10 COPD patients (FEV<sub>1</sub> 53 ± 22% pred) during three symptom-limited bicycle exercise tests while breathing i) without a ventilator (noPS), ii) with a pressure support (PS) of 0 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PS0; IPAP &amp; EPAP 4 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) and iii) PS of 10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PS10; IPAP 14 &amp; EPAP 4 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) on separate days using a randomized crossover design. <italic>Results:</italic> WL<sub>peak</sub> was significantly lower with PS10 (33 ± 16) and PS0 (30.5 ± 13) than noPS (43 ± 19) (p &lt; 0.001). Dyspnea at peak exercise was similar with noPS, PS0 and PS10; at isoload it was lower with noPS compared to PS10 and PS0 (p &lt; 0.01). V<sub>T</sub> and V<sub>E</sub> were highest with PS10 and lowest with noPS both at peak exercise and isoload (p &lt; 0.001). EELV was similar at peak exercise with all three conditions.<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold> <italic>Background:</italic> Although BiPAP has been used as an adjunct to exercise, little is know about its effect on exercise in COPD. We aimed to evaluate the acute effect of BiPAP delivered with a standard valve (Vision, Respironics), compared to no assist, on exercise capacity in individuals with COPD. <italic>Methods:</italic> Peak exercise workload (WL<sub>peak</sub>), dyspnea (Borg), end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>), minute ventilation (V<sub>E</sub>), O<sub>2</sub> uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), and CO<sub>2</sub> production (VCO<sub>2</sub>) were assessed in 10 COPD patients (FEV<sub>1</sub> 53 ± 22% pred) during three symptom-limited bicycle exercise tests while breathing i) without a ventilator (noPS), ii) with a pressure support (PS) of 0 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PS0; IPAP &amp; EPAP 4 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) and iii) PS of 10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PS10; IPAP 14 &amp; EPAP 4 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) on separate days using a randomized crossover design. <italic>Results:</italic> WL<sub>peak</sub> was significantly lower with PS10 (33 ± 16) and PS0 (30.5 ± 13) than noPS (43 ± 19) (p &lt; 0.001). Dyspnea at peak exercise was similar with noPS, PS0 and PS10; at isoload it was lower with noPS compared to PS10 and PS0 (p &lt; 0.01). V<sub>T</sub> and V<sub>E</sub> were highest with PS10 and lowest with noPS both at peak exercise and isoload (p &lt; 0.001). EELV was similar at peak exercise with all three conditions. VO<sub>2</sub> and VCO<sub>2</sub> were greater with PS10 and PS0 than noPS (p &lt; 0.001), both at peak exercise and isoload. <italic>Conclusion:</italic> Use of BiPAP with a standard exhalation valve during exercise increases V<sub>T</sub> and V<sub>E</sub> at the expense of augmenting VCO<sub>2</sub> and dyspnea, which in turns reduces WL<sub>peak</sub> in COPD patients.</bold> </p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- COPD. Volume 12:Number 1(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- COPD
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Number 1(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0012-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 46
- Page End:
- 54
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02-01
- Subjects:
- Lungs -- Diseases, Obstructive -- Periodicals
616.24 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/journal/cop ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/15412555.2014.908830 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1541-2555
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3465.850000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4384.xml