Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured on a biopsy sample: A validation study in vivo. Issue 2 (19th November 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured on a biopsy sample: A validation study in vivo. Issue 2 (19th November 2014)
- Main Title:
- Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured on a biopsy sample: A validation study in vivo
- Authors:
- Urru, Silvana Anna Maria
Tandurella, Igor
Capasso, Mario
Usala, Emilio
Baronciani, Donatella
Giardini, Claudio
Visani, Giuseppe
Angelucci, Emanuele - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Determination of liver iron concentration is essential to predict iron related tissue damage and to guide chelation therapy. To assess the reliability of a single biopsy iron concentration determination in representing the whole liver iron concentration, we conducted a prospective study performing two immediately successive liver biopsies from 61 noncirrhotic, iron overloaded thalassemia patients, directing the needle to different direction from the same skin cut. The correlation among sample biopsies was determined by both regression analysis and the Bland–Altman method. The results showed that overall correlation between the two samples was high (Pearson's coefficient of correlation <italic>r</italic> = 0.970, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001; 95% CI 0.951–0.981; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.941). To evaluate if sample dimension had an impact on the analysis we analyzed separately biopsy couples were both sample gross weight were ≥1 mg dry weight (<italic>n</italic> = 16) from the others [one or both had a specimen gross weight &lt;1 mg dry weight (<italic>n</italic> = 45)]. In the first case, correlation coefficient <italic>r</italic> was equal to 0.998 (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.995–0.999; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.996) while in the latter was 0.960 (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.928–0.977; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.921). In no<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Determination of liver iron concentration is essential to predict iron related tissue damage and to guide chelation therapy. To assess the reliability of a single biopsy iron concentration determination in representing the whole liver iron concentration, we conducted a prospective study performing two immediately successive liver biopsies from 61 noncirrhotic, iron overloaded thalassemia patients, directing the needle to different direction from the same skin cut. The correlation among sample biopsies was determined by both regression analysis and the Bland–Altman method. The results showed that overall correlation between the two samples was high (Pearson's coefficient of correlation <italic>r</italic> = 0.970, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001; 95% CI 0.951–0.981; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.941). To evaluate if sample dimension had an impact on the analysis we analyzed separately biopsy couples were both sample gross weight were ≥1 mg dry weight (<italic>n</italic> = 16) from the others [one or both had a specimen gross weight &lt;1 mg dry weight (<italic>n</italic> = 45)]. In the first case, correlation coefficient <italic>r</italic> was equal to 0.998 (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.995–0.999; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.996) while in the latter was 0.960 (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.928–0.977; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.921). In no instance second specimen prediction interval was outside the interval implying different prognostic and therapeutic decision if both liver samples gross weight were ≥1 mg dry weight. The Bland–Altman plot analysis showed the same trend observed using Pearson's correlation coefficient in the analyzed sample categories. Hepatic iron concentration determined in "good quality" biopsy specimen (i.e. sample gross weight ≥1 mg dry weight) is a reliable indicator of whole liver iron concentration. Am. J. Hematol. 90:87–90, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of hematology. Volume 90:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- American journal of hematology
- Issue:
- Volume 90:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 90, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 90
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0090-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 87
- Page End:
- 90
- Publication Date:
- 2014-11-19
- Subjects:
- Hematology -- Periodicals
616.15 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8652 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ajh.23878 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0361-8609
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0824.800000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3828.xml