Food shopping behaviours and exposure to discrimination. Issue 5 (27th March 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Food shopping behaviours and exposure to discrimination. Issue 5 (27th March 2013)
- Main Title:
- Food shopping behaviours and exposure to discrimination
- Authors:
- Zenk, Shannon N
Schulz, Amy J
Israel, Barbara A
Mentz, Graciela
Miranda, Patricia Y
Opperman, Alisha
Odoms-Young, Angela M - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1" sec-type="general"> <title>Objective</title> <p>The present study examined food shopping behaviours, particularly distance to grocery shop, and exposure to discrimination.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs2" sec-type="general"> <title>Design</title> <p>Cross-sectional observational study utilizing data from a community survey, neighbourhood food environment observations and the decennial census.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs3" sec-type="general"> <title>Setting</title> <p>Three communities in Detroit, Michigan, USA.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs4" sec-type="subjects"> <title>Subjects</title> <p>Probability sample of 919 African-American, Latino and white adults in 146 census blocks and sixty-nine census block groups.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs5" sec-type="results"> <title>Results</title> <p>On average, respondents shopped for groceries 3·1 miles (4·99 km) from home, with 30·9 % shopping within 1 mile (1·61 km) and 22·3 % shopping more than 5 miles (8·05 km) from home. Longer distance to shop was associated with being younger, African-American (compared with Latino), a woman, higher socio-economic status, lower satisfaction with the neighbourhood food environment, and living in a neighbourhood with higher poverty, without a large grocery store and further from the nearest supermarket. African-Americans and those with the lowest incomes were particularly likely to report unfair treatment at food outlets. Each mile (1·61 km)<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1" sec-type="general"> <title>Objective</title> <p>The present study examined food shopping behaviours, particularly distance to grocery shop, and exposure to discrimination.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs2" sec-type="general"> <title>Design</title> <p>Cross-sectional observational study utilizing data from a community survey, neighbourhood food environment observations and the decennial census.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs3" sec-type="general"> <title>Setting</title> <p>Three communities in Detroit, Michigan, USA.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs4" sec-type="subjects"> <title>Subjects</title> <p>Probability sample of 919 African-American, Latino and white adults in 146 census blocks and sixty-nine census block groups.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs5" sec-type="results"> <title>Results</title> <p>On average, respondents shopped for groceries 3·1 miles (4·99 km) from home, with 30·9 % shopping within 1 mile (1·61 km) and 22·3 % shopping more than 5 miles (8·05 km) from home. Longer distance to shop was associated with being younger, African-American (compared with Latino), a woman, higher socio-economic status, lower satisfaction with the neighbourhood food environment, and living in a neighbourhood with higher poverty, without a large grocery store and further from the nearest supermarket. African-Americans and those with the lowest incomes were particularly likely to report unfair treatment at food outlets. Each mile (1·61 km) increase in distance to shop was associated with a 7 % increase in the odds of unfair treatment; this relationship did not differ by race/ethnicity.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs6" sec-type="conclusion"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The study suggests that unfair treatment in retail interactions warrants investigation as a pathway by which restricted neighbourhood food environments and food shopping behaviours may adversely affect health and contribute to health disparities. Efforts to promote 'healthy' and equitable food environments should emphasize local availability and affordability of a range of healthy food products, as well as fair treatment while shopping regardless of race/ethnicity or socio-economic status.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Public health nutrition. Volume 17:Issue 5(2014)
- Journal:
- Public health nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 17:Issue 5(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 17, Issue 5 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0017-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1167
- Page End:
- 1176
- Publication Date:
- 2013-03-27
- Subjects:
- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutrition policy -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
613.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PHN ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/S136898001300075X ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-9800
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 2987.xml