Operational definitions of successful aging: a systematic review. (March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cosco, Theodore D.; Prina, A. Matthew; Perales, Jaime; Stephan, Blossom C. M.; Brayne, Carol
• Is Part Of: International psychogeriatrics. Volume 26:Number 3(2014:Mar.)
• Page Start: 373
• Page End: 381
• Publication Date: 2014-03
• Subjects: Geriatric psychiatry -- Periodicals; 618.9768905
• DOI: 10.1017/S1041610213002287
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1041-6102

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>Half a century after the inception of the term "successful aging (SA), " a consensus definition has not emerged. The current study aims to provide a comprehensive snapshot of operational definitions of SA.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>A systematic review across MedLine, PsycInfo, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge of quantitative operational definitions of SA was conducted.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>Of the 105 operational definitions, across 84 included studies using unique models, 92.4% (97) included physiological constructs (e.g. physical functioning), 49.5% (52) engagement constructs (e.g. involvement in voluntary work), 48.6% (51) well-being constructs (e.g. life satisfaction), 25.7% (27) personal resources (e.g. resilience), and 5.7% (6) extrinsic factors (e.g. finances). Thirty-four definitions consisted of a single construct, 28 of two constructs, 27 of three constructs, 13 of four constructs, and two of five constructs. The operational definitions utilized in the included studies identify between <1% and >90% of study participants as successfully aging.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>The heterogeneity of these results strongly suggests the multidimensionality of SA and the difficulty in categorizing usual versus successful aging. Although the majority of operationalizations reveal a biomedical focus, studies increasingly use psychosocial and lay components. Lack of consistency in the definition of SA is a fundamental weakness of SA research.</p> </sec> </abstract>