Who Owns the Oil that Traverses a Boundary on the Continental Shelf in an Enclosed Sea? Seeking Answers in Natural Law through Grotius and Selden. (6th November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: LOJA, MELISSA H.
• Is Part Of: Leiden journal of international law. Volume 27:Number 4(2014:Dec.)
• Page Start: 893
• Page End: 911
• Publication Date: 2014-11-06
• Subjects: International law -- Periodicals; International courts -- Periodicals; 341.05
• DOI: 10.1017/S0922156514000405
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0922-1565

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The principle of sovereign rights under UNCLOS countenances competition among littoral states for ownership of a common oil deposit through the unilateral exploitation of their continental shelf. This leads to conflict, wastage, and resource sterilization. However, rather than apply the principle of sovereign rights, states seem to turn to natural law principles as a more reasonable regulation of their activities on the continental shelf. Two sources of natural law principles are relevant. One source consists of a priori principles of sociableness and necessity which prescribe that, for their own preservation, states ought to act pursuant to the common good. These principles underlie energy security policies which espouse interdependence. Another source of natural law principles are international agreements and national laws in which states temper their sovereign rights and interests and recognize the co-existence of the rights and interests of other states in a common deposit. These practices constitute a posteriori intervenient or secondary law of nations, which appears similar to customary law. Adherence is not dictated by conviction that these principles are obligatory. Rather, adherence seems to be based on discernment that, while permissible under the principle of sovereign rights, unilateral appropriation is impermissible under natural law.</p> </abstract>