Patient preferences regarding pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Issue 2 (22nd November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wong, Adrian; Kraus, Peggy S.; Lau, Brandyn D.; Streiff, Michael B.; Haut, Elliott R.; Hobson, Deborah B.; Shermock, Kenneth M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of hospital medicine. Volume 10:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 108
• Page End: 111
• Publication Date: 2014-11-22
• Subjects: Hospital care -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2282
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1553-5592

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians venous thromboembolism prevention guidelines emphasized the importance of considering patient preferences when ordering venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>Determine patient preferences regarding pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>DESIGN</title> <p>Single‐center, mixed‐methods survey.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>SETTING</title> <p>Academic medical center.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>PATIENTS</title> <p>Consecutive hospitalized patients on surgical and medical units.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>MEASUREMENTS</title> <p>Patients were asked about their preferences regarding the route of administration for pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and the rationale for their preference. Qualitative analyses of themes were determined from patient rationale.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>Of the 227 patients, a majority (60.4%) preferred an oral medication, if equally effective to subcutaneous options. Dislike of needles (30.0%) and pain from injection (27.7%) were identified as rationales for their preference. Patients favoring subcutaneous administration (27.5%) identified a presumed faster onset of action (40.3%) as the primary reason for their preference. Patients with a preference for subcutaneous injections were less likely to refuse prophylaxis than patients who preferred an oral route of administration (37.5% vs 51.3%, <italic>P</italic> < 0.0001).</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0008" sec-type="section"> <title>LIMITATION</title> <p>Only medical and surgical patients participated.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2282-sec-0009" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSION</title> <p>In a sample of consecutive medical and surgical patients, a majority preferred an oral route of administration for prophylaxis. Patients preferring subcutaneous injections were less likely to refuse doses of ordered pharmacologic prophylaxis. These results indicate use of an oral agent for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may improve adherence and that integrating patient preferences into care may increase delivery of effective prophylaxis and reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism. <italic>Journal of Hospital Medicine</italic> 2015;10:108–111. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine</p> </sec> </abstract>