Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae in controlling the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean in screenhouse and field experiments. (13th March 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae in controlling the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean in screenhouse and field experiments. (13th March 2014)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae in controlling the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean in screenhouse and field experiments
- Authors:
- Bugeme, David Mugisho
Knapp, Markus
Ekesi, Sunday
Chabi‐Olaye, Adenirin
Boga, Hamadi Iddi
Maniania, Nguya Kalemba - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The efficacy of aqueous and emulsifiable formulations of the fungus <italic>Metarhizium anisopliae</italic> isolate ICIPE78 was evaluated on the population density of <italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic> infesting common bean plants under screenhouse and field conditions. Synthetic acaricide abamectin was included as a check. Bean plants were artificially infested with <italic>T. urticae</italic> and allowed to multiply. Three treatments were applied in the screenhouse and 1 treatment in field trials. Mite density was recorded 2 d before spraying and weekly postspraying. The number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and the dry weight of seeds per plant were recorded only in the screenhouse trials. In both screenhouse and field trials, fungal formulations applied at the concentration of 10<sup>8</sup> conidia/mL and the acaricide reduced the population density of mites as compared to the controls. There were significant differences in <italic>T. urticae</italic> population densities between the treatments at the various post‐spraying sampling dates. In the screenhouse, the mite densities were near zero from 3‐week postspraying in the treated leaves. At 4‐week postspraying, there were no more leaves in the untreated control (T1) and in the control water + Silwet‐L77 (T2). Fungal formulations were as effective as abamectin in reducing mite densities in both screenhouse and field experiments. There were<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The efficacy of aqueous and emulsifiable formulations of the fungus <italic>Metarhizium anisopliae</italic> isolate ICIPE78 was evaluated on the population density of <italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic> infesting common bean plants under screenhouse and field conditions. Synthetic acaricide abamectin was included as a check. Bean plants were artificially infested with <italic>T. urticae</italic> and allowed to multiply. Three treatments were applied in the screenhouse and 1 treatment in field trials. Mite density was recorded 2 d before spraying and weekly postspraying. The number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and the dry weight of seeds per plant were recorded only in the screenhouse trials. In both screenhouse and field trials, fungal formulations applied at the concentration of 10<sup>8</sup> conidia/mL and the acaricide reduced the population density of mites as compared to the controls. There were significant differences in <italic>T. urticae</italic> population densities between the treatments at the various post‐spraying sampling dates. In the screenhouse, the mite densities were near zero from 3‐week postspraying in the treated leaves. At 4‐week postspraying, there were no more leaves in the untreated control (T1) and in the control water + Silwet‐L77 (T2). Fungal formulations were as effective as abamectin in reducing mite densities in both screenhouse and field experiments. There were significant differences in the production parameters during the 2 screenhouse trials, with fungal and abamectin treatments generally having the highest yield. Results of this study underline the potential of the <italic>M. anisopliae</italic> isolate ICIPE78 as an alternative to acaricides for <italic>T. urticae</italic> management.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Insect science. Volume 22:Number 1(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Insect science
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Number 1(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0022-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 121
- Page End:
- 128
- Publication Date:
- 2014-03-13
- Subjects:
- Insects -- Periodicals
Entomology -- Periodicals
595.705 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/dbname=ECO;journal=1672-9609;screen=available;done=referer;FSIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1744-7917/issues ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/ins ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=journal&eissn=1744-7917 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/1744-7917.12111 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1672-9609
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4516.918500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3473.xml