Challenging the paradigm of nitrogen cycling: no evidence of in situ resource partitioning by coexisting plant species in grasslands of contrasting fertility. Issue 2 (23rd December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilkinson, Anna; Hill, Paul W.; Vaieretti, María V.; Farrar, John F.; Jones, Davey L.; Bardgett, Richard D.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 5:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
• Page Start: 275
• Page End: 287
• Publication Date: 2014-12-23
• Subjects: Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1244
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ece31244-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>In monoculture, certain plant species are able to preferentially utilize different nitrogen (N) forms, both inorganic and organic, including amino acids and peptides, thus forming fundamental niches based on the chemical form of N. Results from field studies, however, are inconsistent: Some showing that coexisting plant species predominantly utilize inorganic N, while others reveal distinct interspecies preferences for different N forms. As a result, the extent to which hypothetical niches are realized in nature remains unclear. Here, we used <italic>in situ</italic> stable isotope tracer techniques to test the idea, in temperate grassland, that niche partitioning of N based on chemical form is related to plant productivity and the relative availability of organic and inorganic N. We also tested <italic>in situ</italic> whether grassland plants vary in their ability to compete for, and utilize peptides, which have recently been shown to act as an N source for plants in strongly N‐limited ecosystems. We hypothesized that plants would preferentially use NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>‐N and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>‐N over dissolved organic N in high‐productivity grassland where inorganic N availability is high. On the other hand, in low‐productivity grasslands, where the availability of dissolved inorganic N is low, and soil availability of dissolved organic N is greater, we predicted that plants would preferentially use N from amino acids and peptides, prior to microbial mineralization. Turves from two well‐characterized grasslands of contrasting productivity and soil N availability were injected, in situ, with mixtures of <sup>15</sup>N‐labeled inorganic N (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) and <sup>13</sup>C<sup>15</sup>N labeled amino acid (<sc>l</sc>‐alanine) and peptide (<sc>l</sc>‐tri‐alanine). In order to measure rapid assimilation of these N forms by soil microbes and plants, the uptake of these substrates was traced within 2.5 hours into the shoots of the most abundant plant species, as well as roots and the soil microbial biomass. We found that, contrary to our hypothesis, the majority of plant species across both grasslands took up most N in the form of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, suggesting that inorganic N is their predominant N source. However, we did find that organic N was a source of N which could be utilized by plant species at both sites, and in the low‐productivity grassland, plants were able to capture some tri‐alanine‐N directly. Although our findings did not support the hypothesis that differences in the availability of inorganic and organic N facilitate resource partitioning in grassland, they do support the emerging view that peptides represent a significant, but until now neglected, component of the terrestrial N cycle.</p> </abstract>