Considering species richness and rarity when selecting optimal survey traps: comparisons of semiochemical baited flight intercept traps for Cerambycidae in eastern North America. (23rd July 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Considering species richness and rarity when selecting optimal survey traps: comparisons of semiochemical baited flight intercept traps for Cerambycidae in eastern North America. (23rd July 2014)
- Main Title:
- Considering species richness and rarity when selecting optimal survey traps: comparisons of semiochemical baited flight intercept traps for Cerambycidae in eastern North America
- Authors:
- Dodds, Kevin J.
Allison, Jeremy D.
Miller, Daniel R.
Hanavan, Ryan P.
Sweeney, Jon - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="afe12078-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p id="afe12078-para-0001"> <list id="afe12078-list-0001" list-type="order"> <list-item> <p>We compared standard multiple‐funnel, modified multiple‐funnel, intercept panel and canopy malaise (SLAM) traps with top and bottom collecting cups for their effectiveness (species richness, rarity, abundance) at capturing Cerambycidae in eastern North America.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Experiments were conducted in New York, Louisiana, Massachusetts and Georgia in 2011 and 2012. A combination of pheromones and host volatiles chosen to match local forest types were used as lures.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Species richness tended to be higher in SLAM and modified funnel traps than standard funnel and intercept panel traps. SLAM traps also captured the highest number of species, unique species, rare (species accounting for ≤ 1% of total cerambycids at a site) and singleton species at each site.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Individual‐based rarefaction and sample‐based species accumulation curves suggested that SLAM traps are more effective for capturing cerambycid species. For many estimates, modified funnel and funnel traps were lower than SLAM traps but greater than intercept panel traps for describing cerambycid communities.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Modified funnel and SLAM traps generally captured the highest abundance of cerambycids but the response of the individual subfamily and<abstract abstract-type="main" id="afe12078-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p id="afe12078-para-0001"> <list id="afe12078-list-0001" list-type="order"> <list-item> <p>We compared standard multiple‐funnel, modified multiple‐funnel, intercept panel and canopy malaise (SLAM) traps with top and bottom collecting cups for their effectiveness (species richness, rarity, abundance) at capturing Cerambycidae in eastern North America.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Experiments were conducted in New York, Louisiana, Massachusetts and Georgia in 2011 and 2012. A combination of pheromones and host volatiles chosen to match local forest types were used as lures.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Species richness tended to be higher in SLAM and modified funnel traps than standard funnel and intercept panel traps. SLAM traps also captured the highest number of species, unique species, rare (species accounting for ≤ 1% of total cerambycids at a site) and singleton species at each site.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Individual‐based rarefaction and sample‐based species accumulation curves suggested that SLAM traps are more effective for capturing cerambycid species. For many estimates, modified funnel and funnel traps were lower than SLAM traps but greater than intercept panel traps for describing cerambycid communities.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Modified funnel and SLAM traps generally captured the highest abundance of cerambycids but the response of the individual subfamily and species varied by trap type.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>SLAM traps should be considered as a strong tool to describe cerambycid communities when used in conjunction with pheromones and host volatiles.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Agricultural and forest entomology. Volume 17:Number 1(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Agricultural and forest entomology
- Issue:
- Volume 17:Number 1(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 17, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0017-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 36
- Page End:
- 47
- Publication Date:
- 2014-07-23
- Subjects:
- Insect pests -- Control -- Periodicals
Agricultural pests -- Control -- Periodicals
Forest insects -- Control -- Periodicals
632.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1461-9563 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/afe.12078 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1461-9555
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0742.880000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3213.xml