Effect of Minimized Perfusion Circuit on Brain Injury Markers Carnosinase and Brain‐Type Fatty Binding Protein in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients. Issue 2 (30th September 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pahari, Dipak R.; Gu, Y. John; van Oeveren, Willem; El‐Essawi, Aschraf; Harringer, Wolfgang; Brouwer, René M.H.
• Is Part Of: Artificial organs. Volume 37:Issue 2(2013:Feb.)
• Page Start: 128
• Page End: 135
• Publication Date: 2012-09-30
• Subjects: Artificial organs -- Periodicals; 617.956
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01532.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-564X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>A minimized perfusion circuit (MPC) has proven to be superior to the conventional circulatory perfusion bypass (CCPB) as it reduces the blood–material interaction and hemodilution. Until now not much is known about impact these different perfusion systems have on the brain. The objective of this study is to determine carnosinase and brain‐type fatty binding protein (BFABP) activity as novel specific biomarkers for ischemic brain tissue damage and how their activity differs during and after MPC and CCPB as well as to compare the inflammatory response of both perfusion systems. In a prospective pilot study, 28 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly divided into an MPC group (<italic>n</italic> = 14) and a CCPB group (<italic>n</italic> = 14). Blood samples were taken before, during, and after operation until the fifth postoperative day. The brain biomarker carnosinase was determined by measuring the rate of histidine production from the substrate homocarnosine, whereas BFABP and interleukin‐6 were determined by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). C‐reactive protein (CRP) and endothelin‐1 were determined by enzyme immunoassay. The mean serum carnosinase activity was significantly higher in MPC (0.57 ± 0.34 nM histidine/mL/min) as compared with the CCPB group (0.36 ± 0.13 nM histidine/mL/min) at the end of operation (<italic>P</italic> = 0.02). The BFABP did not show any difference between the two groups in the immediate postoperative period until the second postoperative day. From that time point onward, it showed a steep increase in the CCPB group (581.3 ± 157.11 pg/mL) as compared with the concentrations in the MPC group (384.6 ± 39 pg/mL) (<italic>P</italic> = 0.04). The inflammation markers interleukin‐6 and CRP showed a similar pattern in both groups without significant difference. In contrast, the leukocyte count on operation day and endothelin‐1 on the first postoperative day were significantly higher in the CCPB group (<italic>P</italic> = 0.01, <italic>P</italic> = 0.03, respectively). MPC showed a significant higher and stable serum carnosinase activity during extracorporeal circulation as compared with the CCPB due to less hemodilution and a better preserved oxygen capacity. As a consequence, the antioxidant stress during MPC is limited as compared with CCPB, which means less brain tissue damage reflected by a lower BFABP release. Except endothelin‐1 and leukocyte count, the inflammatory response of the MPC and CCPB was equal.</p> </abstract>