Institute of Medicine 2009 Gestational Weight Gain Guideline Knowledge: Survey of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Family Medicine Residents of the United States. Issue 4 (December 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Institute of Medicine 2009 Gestational Weight Gain Guideline Knowledge: Survey of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Family Medicine Residents of the United States. Issue 4 (December 2013)
- Main Title:
- Institute of Medicine 2009 Gestational Weight Gain Guideline Knowledge: Survey of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Family Medicine Residents of the United States
- Authors:
- Moore Simas, Tiffany A
Waring, Molly E
Sullivan, Gina M T
Liao, Xun
Rosal, Milagros C
Hardy, Janet R
Berry Jr, Robert E - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="birt12061-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="birt12061-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>In 2009, the Institute of Medicine revised gestational weight gain recommendations; revisions included body mass index (BMI) category cut‐point changes and provision of range of gain for obese women. Our objective was to examine resident prenatal caregivers' knowledge of revised guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12061-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Anonymous electronic survey of obstetrics/gynecology and family medicine residents across the United States from January to April 2010.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12061-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Overall, 660 completed the survey; 79 percent female and 69 percent aged between 21 and 30. When permitted to select ≥ 1 response, 87.0 percent reported using BMI to assess weight status at initial visits, 44.4 percent reported using "clinical impression based on patient appearance, " and 1.4 percent reported not using any parameters. When asked the most important baseline parameter for providing recommendations, 35.8 percent correctly identified prepregnancy BMI, 2.1 percent reported "I don't provide guidelines, " and 4.5 percent reported "I do not discuss gestational weight gain." Among respondents, 57.6 percent reported not being aware of new guidelines. Only 7.6 percent selected correct BMI ranges for each category, and only<abstract abstract-type="main" id="birt12061-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="birt12061-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>In 2009, the Institute of Medicine revised gestational weight gain recommendations; revisions included body mass index (BMI) category cut‐point changes and provision of range of gain for obese women. Our objective was to examine resident prenatal caregivers' knowledge of revised guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12061-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Anonymous electronic survey of obstetrics/gynecology and family medicine residents across the United States from January to April 2010.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12061-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Overall, 660 completed the survey; 79 percent female and 69 percent aged between 21 and 30. When permitted to select ≥ 1 response, 87.0 percent reported using BMI to assess weight status at initial visits, 44.4 percent reported using "clinical impression based on patient appearance, " and 1.4 percent reported not using any parameters. When asked the most important baseline parameter for providing recommendations, 35.8 percent correctly identified prepregnancy BMI, 2.1 percent reported "I don't provide guidelines, " and 4.5 percent reported "I do not discuss gestational weight gain." Among respondents, 57.6 percent reported not being aware of new guidelines. Only 7.6 percent selected correct BMI ranges for each category, and only 5.8 percent selected correct gestational weight gain ranges. Only 2.3 percent correctly identified both BMI cutoffs and recommended gestational weight gain ranges per 2009 guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="birt12061-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Guideline knowledge is the foundation of accurate counseling, yet resident prenatal caregivers were minimally aware of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines almost a year after their publication.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Birth. Volume 40:Issue 4(2013:Dec.)
- Journal:
- Birth
- Issue:
- Volume 40:Issue 4(2013:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 40, Issue 4 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0040-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 237
- Page End:
- 246
- Publication Date:
- 2013-12
- Subjects:
- Childbirth -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Newborn infants -- Care -- Periodicals
Natural childbirth -- Periodicals
618.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1523-536X ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=bir ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118533571/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/birt.12061 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0730-7659
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2094.081000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3320.xml