Two‐Stage Hierarchical Group Testing for Multiple Infections with Application to the Infertility Prevention Project. Issue 4 (4th October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tebbs, Joshua M.; McMahan, Christopher S.; Bilder, Christopher R.
• Is Part Of: Biometrics. Volume 69:Issue 4(2013)
• Page Start: 1064
• Page End: 1073
• Publication Date: 2013-10-04
• Subjects: Biometry -- Periodicals; 570.15195
• DOI: 10.1111/biom.12080
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-341X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="biom12080-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>Screening for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) has benefited greatly from the use of group testing (pooled testing) to lower costs. With the development of assays that detect multiple infections, screening practices now involve testing pools of individuals for multiple infections simultaneously. Building on the research for single infection group testing procedures, we examine the performance of group testing for multiple infections. Our work is motivated by chlamydia and gonorrhea testing for the infertility prevention project (IPP), a national program in the United States. We consider a two‐stage pooling algorithm currently used to perform testing for the IPP. We first derive the operating characteristics of this algorithm for classification purposes (e.g., expected number of tests, misclassification probabilities, etc.) and identify pool sizes that minimize the expected number of tests. We then develop an expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate probabilities of infection using both group and individual retest responses. Our research shows that group testing can offer large cost savings when classifying individuals for multiple infections and can provide prevalence estimates that are actually more efficient than those from individual testing.</p> </sec> </abstract>