A Comparison of mucosal surface area and villous histology in small intestines of the Brazilian free‐tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis) and the mouse (Mus musculus). (18th August 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Comparison of mucosal surface area and villous histology in small intestines of the Brazilian free‐tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis) and the mouse (Mus musculus). (18th August 2014)
- Main Title:
- A Comparison of mucosal surface area and villous histology in small intestines of the Brazilian free‐tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis) and the mouse (Mus musculus)
- Authors:
- Zhang, Zhi‐Qiang
Brun, Antonio
Price, Edwin R.
Cruz‐Neto, Ariovaldo P.
Karasov, William H.
Caviedes‐Vidal, Enrique - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>Studies on birds have led to the hypothesis that increased intestinal absorption between enterocytes (paracellular) evolved as a compensation for smaller intestinal size in fliers, which was perhaps selected to minimize the mass of digesta carried. This hypothesis predicts that bats will also exhibit relatively reduced intestinal size and high paracellular absorption, compared with nonflying mammals. Published studies on three bat species indicate relatively high paracellular absorption. One mechanism for increasing paracellular absorption per cm<sup>2</sup> small intestine (SI) is increased number of tight junctions (TJs) across which paracellular absorption occurs. To our knowledge, we provide the first comparative analysis of enterocyte size and number in flying and nonflying mammals. Intestines of insectivorous bats <italic>Tadarida brasiliensis</italic> were compared with <italic>Mus musculus</italic> using hematoxylin and eosin staining method. Bats had shorter and narrower SIs than mice, and after correction for body size difference by normalizing to mass<sup>3/4</sup>, the bats had 40% less nominal surface area than the mouse, as predicted. Villous enhancement of surface area was 90% greater in the bat than in the mouse, mainly because of longer villi and a greater density of villi in bat intestines. Bat and mouse were similar in enterocyte diameter. Bats exceeded mice by 54.4% in villous area per cm length<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>Studies on birds have led to the hypothesis that increased intestinal absorption between enterocytes (paracellular) evolved as a compensation for smaller intestinal size in fliers, which was perhaps selected to minimize the mass of digesta carried. This hypothesis predicts that bats will also exhibit relatively reduced intestinal size and high paracellular absorption, compared with nonflying mammals. Published studies on three bat species indicate relatively high paracellular absorption. One mechanism for increasing paracellular absorption per cm<sup>2</sup> small intestine (SI) is increased number of tight junctions (TJs) across which paracellular absorption occurs. To our knowledge, we provide the first comparative analysis of enterocyte size and number in flying and nonflying mammals. Intestines of insectivorous bats <italic>Tadarida brasiliensis</italic> were compared with <italic>Mus musculus</italic> using hematoxylin and eosin staining method. Bats had shorter and narrower SIs than mice, and after correction for body size difference by normalizing to mass<sup>3/4</sup>, the bats had 40% less nominal surface area than the mouse, as predicted. Villous enhancement of surface area was 90% greater in the bat than in the mouse, mainly because of longer villi and a greater density of villi in bat intestines. Bat and mouse were similar in enterocyte diameter. Bats exceeded mice by 54.4% in villous area per cm length SI and by 95% in number of enterocytes per cm<sup>2</sup> of the nominal surface area of the SI. Therefore, an increased density of TJs per cm<sup>2</sup> SI may be a mechanistic explanation that helps to understand the high paracellular absorption observed in bats compared to nonflying mammals. J. Morphol. 276:102–108, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of morphology. Volume 276:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Journal of morphology
- Issue:
- Volume 276:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 276, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 276
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0276-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 102
- Page End:
- 108
- Publication Date:
- 2014-08-18
- Subjects:
- Morphology -- Periodicals
Physiology -- Periodicals
Anatomy -- Periodicals
571.3 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4687 ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/109907986 ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/35280 \9 20080302 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jmor.20324 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0362-2525
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5021.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3491.xml