Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. (19th September 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. (19th September 2014)
- Main Title:
- Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
- Authors:
- PAPPONE, CARLO
ĆALOVIĆ, ŽARKO
VICEDOMINI, GABRIELE
CUKO, AMARILD
MCSPADDEN, LUKE C.
RYU, KYUNGMOO
ROMANO, ENRICO
BALDI, MARIO
SAVIANO, MASSIMO
PAPPONE, ALESSIA
CIACCIO, CRISTIANO
GIANNELLI, LUIGI
IONESCU, BOGDAN
PETRETTA, ANDREA
VITALE, RAFFAELE
FUNDALIOTIS, ANGELICA
TAVAZZI, LUIGI
SANTINELLI, VINCENZO - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Multipoint LV Pacing Improves Mid‐Term CRT Response</title> <sec id="jce12513-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves acute LV function. We hypothesized that multipoint pacing (MPP) can improve midterm echocardiographic and clinical response compared with conventional CRT.</p> </sec> <sec id="jce12513-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods and Results</title> <p>Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT‐D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) were randomized to receive biventricular (BiV) pacing with either conventional LV pacing (CONV group) or MPP (MPP group). For each patient, an optimal pacing configuration for the assigned pacing mode was programmed based on intraoperative pressure‐volume (PV) loop measurements. A clinical evaluation and transthoracic echocardiogram were performed before implant (BASELINE) and at 3 months postimplant and analyzed by a blinded observer. A reduction in end‐systolic volume (ESV) of ≥15% relative to BASELINE was prospectively defined as response to CRT. Forty‐four patients (NYHA Class III, EF 29 ± 6%, QRS duration 152 ± 17 milliseconds) were enrolled and randomized. One patient in the MPP group was lost to follow‐up and excluded from further analysis. After 3 months, 11 of 22 (50%) CONV<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Multipoint LV Pacing Improves Mid‐Term CRT Response</title> <sec id="jce12513-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves acute LV function. We hypothesized that multipoint pacing (MPP) can improve midterm echocardiographic and clinical response compared with conventional CRT.</p> </sec> <sec id="jce12513-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods and Results</title> <p>Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT‐D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) were randomized to receive biventricular (BiV) pacing with either conventional LV pacing (CONV group) or MPP (MPP group). For each patient, an optimal pacing configuration for the assigned pacing mode was programmed based on intraoperative pressure‐volume (PV) loop measurements. A clinical evaluation and transthoracic echocardiogram were performed before implant (BASELINE) and at 3 months postimplant and analyzed by a blinded observer. A reduction in end‐systolic volume (ESV) of ≥15% relative to BASELINE was prospectively defined as response to CRT. Forty‐four patients (NYHA Class III, EF 29 ± 6%, QRS duration 152 ± 17 milliseconds) were enrolled and randomized. One patient in the MPP group was lost to follow‐up and excluded from further analysis. After 3 months, 11 of 22 (50%) CONV patients and 16 of 21 (76%) MPP patients were classified as responders. ESV reduction, EF increase, and NYHA class reduction relative to BASELINE were significantly greater in the MPP group than in the CONV group (ESV: −21.0 ± 13.9 vs. −12.6 ± 11.1%, P = 0.03; EF: +9.8 ± 5.1 vs. +2.0 ± 7.8 percentage points, P &lt; 0.001; ΔNYHA: −1.05 ± 0.22 vs. −0.72 ± 0.46 functional classes, P = 0.006).</p> </sec> <sec id="jce12513-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>PV loop optimized BiV pacing with MPP resulted in an improved rate of response to CRT.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Volume 26:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0026-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 58
- Page End:
- 63
- Publication Date:
- 2014-09-19
- Subjects:
- Blood vessels -- Physiology -- Periodicals
Electrophysiology -- Periodicals
Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals
612.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/jce.12513 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1045-3873
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.866000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4071.xml