Effects of different feed stimulants on freshwater crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), fed diets with or without partial replacement of fish meal by biofeed. (28th February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hua, X.M.; Shui, C.; He, Y.D.; Xing, S.H.; Yu, N.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Zhao, C.Y.
• Is Part Of: Aquaculture nutrition. Volume 21:Number 1(2015:Feb.)
• Page Start: 113
• Page End: 120
• Publication Date: 2014-02-28
• Subjects: Aquaculture -- Periodicals; Aquatic animals -- Feeding and feeds -- Periodicals; Fishes -- Feeding and feeds -- Periodicals; 639.3
• DOI: 10.1111/anu.12148
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1353-5773

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="anu12148-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The feeding trials were carried out with freshwater crayfish (<italic>Procambarus clarkii</italic>) to evaluate the three feed stimulants betaine (Bet), squid extract (SE) and squid meal (SM) upon fish meal (FM) diets or biofeed (BF) diets in which FM were partially replaced by BF. Results showed the three feed stimulants had no significant effect on growth. By the relative concentration of markers in the faeces and diets, the preference for each diet was estimated, and the best stimulant was the mixture of Bet, SE and SM. As FM replaced by BF increased, added with the mixture, the relative weight gain showed an increasing trend, but decreased significantly by 30% replacement. With the substitution increasing, trypsin activities increased, whereas decreased too upon 30% substitution. Less than 30% replacement, there was no significant effect on muscle proximate composition, intestine amylase activities and serum haemocyanin contents, except the drop of lipid. The results indicated that the mixture of Bet, SE and SM could perform well as a feed stimulant. And with the addition of the mixture, FM in the diet could make about no more than 20% saving without any adverse effects.</p> </abstract>