Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire. (7th October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andrade, Jackie; May, Jon; Deeprose, Catherine; Baugh, Sarah‐Jane; Ganis, Giorgio
• Is Part Of: British journal of psychology. Volume 105:Part 4(2014:Nov.)
• Page Start: 547
• Page End: 563
• Publication Date: 2013-10-07
• Subjects: Psychology -- Periodicals; 150.5
• DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12050
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1269

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjop12050-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Mental imagery may occur in any sensory modality, although visual imagery has been most studied. A sensitive measure of the vividness of imagery across a range of modalities is needed: the shorter version of Bett's Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (Sheehan, <xref ref-type="link" rid="bjop12050-bib-0071">1967</xref>, <italic>J. Clin. Psychology</italic>, 23, 386) uses outdated items and has an unreliable factor structure. We report the development and initial validation of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi‐Q) comprising items for each of the following modalities: Vision, Sound, Smell, Taste, Touch, Bodily Sensation, and Emotional Feeling. An exploratory factor analysis on a 35‐item form indicated that these modalities formed separate factors, rather than a single imagery factor, and this was replicated by confirmatory factor analysis. The Psi‐Q was validated against the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (Reisberg <italic>et al</italic>., <xref ref-type="link" rid="bjop12050-bib-0064">2003</xref>, <italic>Appl. Cogn. Psychology</italic>, 17, 147) and Marks' (<xref ref-type="link" rid="bjop12050-bib-0047">1995</xref>, <italic>J. Mental Imagery</italic>, 19, 153) Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire‐2 (VVIQ‐2). A short 21‐item form comprising the best three items from the seven factors correlated with the total score and subscales of the full form, and with the VVIQ‐2. Inspection of the data shows that while visual and sound imagery is most often rated as vivid, individuals who rate one modality as strong and the other as weak are not uncommon. Findings are interpreted within a working memory framework and point to the need for further research to identify the specific cognitive processes underlying the vividness of imagery across sensory modalities.</p> </abstract>