Assessment of smear layer removal protocols in curved root canals. (6th August 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yeung, William; Raldi, Denise Pontes; Cunha, Rodrigo Sanches; Mello, Isabel
• Is Part Of: Australian endodontic journal. Volume 40:Number 2(2014:Apr.)
• Page Start: 66
• Page End: 71
• Publication Date: 2013-08-06
• Subjects: Endodontics -- Periodicals; Endodontics -- Periodicals; 617.6342
• DOI: 10.1111/aej.12038
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1329-1947

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>This study sought to assess if the final rinse protocol interferes with the smear layer removal in the apical area of curved canals. Sixty‐four extracted human mandibular molars with curved mesial roots were instrumented with rotary files and divided into six experimental groups for final rinse: 1EDTA (syringe irrigation with 1 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) ), 5EDTA (syringe irrigation with 5 mL of 17% EDTA), 1EDTA‐P (syringe irrigation with 1 mL of 17% EDTA + pumping with gutta‐percha point), 5EDTA‐P (syringe irrigation with 5 mL of 17% EDTA + pumping with gutta‐percha point), 1EDTA‐EA (syringe irrigation with 1 mL of 17% EDTA + EndoActivator) and 5EDTA‐EA (syringe irrigation with 5 mL of 17% EDTA + EndoActivator). Final rinsing was carried out over 3 min. The specimens were split lengthwise and observed under a scanning electron microscope using a score criterion. Comparison among the groups showed statistically significant difference only between the 5EDTA‐EA group and the other groups (Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's post‐hoc tests, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). The combination of 5 mL of 17% EDTA and 3 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) with the EndoActivator removed smear layer from the apical area of curved root canals more effectively than the other protocols used.</p> </abstract>