Pre‐ and post‐training session evaluation for interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of probe‐based confocal laser endomicroscopy for biliary strictures. Issue 4 (18th December 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Talreja, Jayant P.; Turner, Brian G.; Gress, Frank G.; Ho, Sammy; Sarkaria, Savreet; Paddu, Naveen; Natov, Nikola; Bharmal, Sheila; Gaidhane, Monica; Sethi, Amrita; Kahaleh, Michel
• Is Part Of: Digestive endoscopy. Volume 26:Issue 4(2014:Jul.)
• Page Start: 577
• Page End: 580
• Publication Date: 2013-12-18
• Subjects: Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Endoscopy -- Periodicals; Digestive System Diseases -- diagnosis -- Periodicals; Digestive System Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals; Endoscopy -- Periodicals; 616.3
• DOI: 10.1111/den.12214
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0915-5635

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="den12214-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background and Aim</title> <p>Current diagnostic modalities for indeterminate biliary strictures offer low accuracy. Probe‐based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) permits microscopic assessment of mucosal structures by obtaining real‐time high‐resolution images of the mucosal layers of the gastrointestinal tract. Previously, an interobserver study demonstrated poor to fair agreement even among experienced confocal endomicroscopy operators. Our objective was to assess interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy upon completion of a pCLE training session.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12214-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Forty de‐identified pCLE video clips of indeterminate biliary strictures were sent to five endoscopists at four tertiary care centers for scoring. Observers subsequently attended a teaching session by an expert pCLE user that included 20 training clips and rescored the same pCLE video clips, which were randomized and renumbered.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12214-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Pre‐training interobserver agreement for all observers was 'fair' (Κ: 0.31, <italic>P</italic>‐value: <0.0001) and diagnostic accuracy was 72% (55–80%). Post‐training interobserver agreement for all observers was 'substantial' (Κ: 0.74, <italic>P</italic>‐value: <0.0001) and diagnostic accuracy was 89% (80–95%). Using a paired <italic>t</italic>‐test, we observed an increase of 17% (95% CI 7.6–26.4) in post‐training diagnostic accuracy (<italic>t</italic> = 5.01, df = 4, <italic>P</italic>‐value 0.007).</p> </sec> <sec id="den12214-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy improved after observers underwent training by an expert pCLE user with a specific sequence set. Users should participate in such training programs to maximize diagnostic accuracy of pCLE evaluation.</p> </sec> </abstract>