To excise or not: impact of MelaFind on German dermatologists' decisions to biopsy atypical lesions. (18th June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- To excise or not: impact of MelaFind on German dermatologists' decisions to biopsy atypical lesions. (18th June 2014)
- Main Title:
- To excise or not: impact of MelaFind on German dermatologists' decisions to biopsy atypical lesions
- Authors:
- Hauschild, Axel
Chen, Suephy C.
Weichenthal, Michael
Blum, Andreas
King, Hadley C.
Goldsmith, Jeff
Scharfstein, Daniel
Gutkowicz‐Krusin, Dina - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To determine the biopsy sensitivity to melanoma of dermatologists in Germany and the impact of MelaFind® on their decisions to biopsy melanomas.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Randomized two‐armed online reader study presenting case information, clinical/dermatoscopic images of pigmented skin lesions and MelaFind results (Arm 2).</p> </sec> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Each participant was asked to review 130 pigmented skin lesions. Biopsy decisions of dermatologists without MelaFind versus MelaFind and dermatologists without MelaFind versus dermatologists with MelaFind were compared.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0040" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Dermatologists without MelaFind had average sensitivity to melanoma of 69.5 % and average specificity of 55.9 %. MelaFind had greater sensitivity than dermatologists alone (96.9 % vs. 69.5 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001) and lower specificity (9.2 % vs. 55.9 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001). Dermatologists with MelaFind had higher sensitivity than those without MelaFind (78 % vs. 69.5 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001) and a lower specificity (45.8 % vs. 55.9 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001). The number of dermatologists detecting over 90 % of melanomas increased from 3 of 101 without MelaFind to 22 of<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To determine the biopsy sensitivity to melanoma of dermatologists in Germany and the impact of MelaFind® on their decisions to biopsy melanomas.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Randomized two‐armed online reader study presenting case information, clinical/dermatoscopic images of pigmented skin lesions and MelaFind results (Arm 2).</p> </sec> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Each participant was asked to review 130 pigmented skin lesions. Biopsy decisions of dermatologists without MelaFind versus MelaFind and dermatologists without MelaFind versus dermatologists with MelaFind were compared.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0040" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Dermatologists without MelaFind had average sensitivity to melanoma of 69.5 % and average specificity of 55.9 %. MelaFind had greater sensitivity than dermatologists alone (96.9 % vs. 69.5 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001) and lower specificity (9.2 % vs. 55.9 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001). Dermatologists with MelaFind had higher sensitivity than those without MelaFind (78 % vs. 69.5 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001) and a lower specificity (45.8 % vs. 55.9 %, one‐sided p &lt; 0.00001). The number of dermatologists detecting over 90 % of melanomas increased from 3 of 101 without MelaFind to 22 of 101 with MelaFind (p = 0.00006) while specificity remained relatively equivalent (23 % vs. 21 %, p = 0.99).</p> </sec> <sec id="ddg12362-sec-0050" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The MelaFind information, when incorporated into the final biopsy decision, can improve biopsy sensitivity with modest effect on biopsy specificity.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. Volume 12:Number 7(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Number 7(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 7 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0012-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 606
- Page End:
- 614
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-18
- Subjects:
- Skin -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Dermatology -- Periodicals
616.5005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/ddg.12362 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1610-0379
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4663.460655
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4341.xml