Delaying the American Board of Emergency Medicine Qualifying Examination Is Associated With Poorer Performance. (June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marco, Catherine A.; Counselman, Francis L.; Korte, Robert C.; Purosky, Robert G.; Whitley, Cameron Thomas; Reisdorff, Earl J.; Burton, John
• Is Part Of: Academic emergency medicine. Volume 21:Number 6(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 688
• Page End: 693
• Publication Date: 2014-06
• Subjects: Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1111/acem.12391
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1069-6563

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="acem12391-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="acem12391-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The initial step in certification by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) requires passing a multiple‐choice‐question qualifying examination. The qualifying examination is typically taken in the first year after residency training. This study was undertaken to determine if a delay in taking the qualifying examination is associated with poorer performance. The authors also examined the relationship between in‐training examination scores and qualifying examination scores.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12391-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This was a pooled time‐series cross‐section study. Primary measurements were initial qualifying examination scores, the timing of the qualifying examination, and in‐training examination scores. The three groups, based on qualifying examination timing, were immediate, 1‐year delay, and ≥2‐year delay. In‐training examination scores were analyzed to determine the relationship between intrinsic ability, examination timing, and qualifying examination scores. For analysis, a generic pooled ordinary least‐squares dummy variable model with robust standard errors was used. A pre hoc level of significance was determined to be α < 0.01.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12391-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>There were 16, 353 qualifying examination test administrations between 2000 and 2012. In‐training examination scores were positively correlated with qualifying examination scores (p < 0.001). The group pass rates were 98.9% immediate, 95.6% 1‐year delay, and 86.6% ≥2‐year delay. After controlling for in‐training examination scores, delay taking the qualifying examination of 1 year was associated with a decrease in score of –0.6 (p = 0.003). A delay in taking the qualifying examination ≥2 years was associated with a decrease in score of –2.5 points (p < 0.001).</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12391-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>After accounting for innate ability using in‐training examination scores, delay taking the qualifying examination was associated with poorer performance. This effect was more pronounced if the delay was ≥2 years.</p> </sec> </abstract>