A disease‐specific enteral nutrition formula improves nutritional status and functional performance in patients with head and neck and esophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy: Results of a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Issue 18 (13th June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fietkau, Rainer; Lewitzki, Victor; Kuhnt, Thomas; Hölscher, Tobias; Hess, Clemens‐F.; Berger, Bernhard; Wiegel, Thomas; Rödel, Claus; Niewald, Marcus; Hermann, Robert M.; Lubgan, Dorota
• Is Part Of: Cancer. Volume 119:Issue 18(2013)
• Page Start: 3343
• Page End: 3353
• Publication Date: 2013-06-13
• Subjects: Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28197
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-543X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="cncr28197-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>In patients with head and neck and esophageal tumors, nutritional status may deteriorate during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of enteral nutrition enriched with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on body composition and nutritional and functional status.</p> </sec> <sec id="cncr28197-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>METHODS</title> <p>In a controlled, randomized, prospective, double‐blind, multicenter study, 111 patients with head and neck and esophageal cancer undergoing concurrent CRT received either an enteral standard nutrition (control group) or disease‐specific enteral nutrition Supportan<sup>®</sup>‐containing EPA+DHA (experimental group) via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The primary endpoint was the change of body cell mass (BCM) following CRT at weeks 7 and 14 compared with the baseline value. Secondary endpoints were additional parameters of body composition, anthropometric parameters, and nutritional and functional status.</p> </sec> <sec id="cncr28197-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>The primary endpoint of the study, improvement in BCM, reached borderline statistical significance. Following CRT, patients with experimental nutrition lost only 0.82 ± 0.64 kg of BCM compared with 2.82 ± 0.77 kg in the control group (<italic>P</italic> = .055). The objectively measured nutritional parameters, such as body weight and fat‐free mass, showed a tendency toward improvement, but the differences were not significant. The subjective parameters, in particular the Kondrup score (<italic>P</italic> = .0165) and the subjective global assessment score (<italic>P</italic> = .0065) after follow‐up improved significantly in the experimental group, compared with the control group. Both enteral regimens were safe and well tolerated.</p> </sec> <sec id="cncr28197-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSION</title> <p>Enteral nutrition with EPA and DHA may be advantageous in patients with head and neck or esophageal cancer by improving parameters of nutritional and functional status during CRT. <bold><italic>Cancer</italic> 2013;119:3343–53</bold>. © <italic>2013 American Cancer Society</italic>.</p> </sec> </abstract>