Added cancer yield of breast magnetic resonance imaging screening in women with a prior history of chest radiation therapy. Issue 3 (5th September 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Freitas, Vivianne; Scaranelo, Anabel; Menezes, Ravi; Kulkarni, Supriya; Hodgson, David; Crystal, Pavel
• Is Part Of: Cancer. Volume 119:Issue 3(2013)
• Page Start: 495
• Page End: 503
• Publication Date: 2012-09-05
• Subjects: Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27771
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-543X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND:</title> <p>Recommendation for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening for women with a prior history of chest radiation is currently based on expert opinion, because existing data are very scant. The objective of this study was to evaluate added cancer yield of screening breast MRI in this population.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>METHODS:</title> <p>A retrospective review identified 98 women with a prior history of chest radiation therapy who had screening mammography and screening MRI performed at the authors' institution between January 2004 and July 2010. Medical records of these patients and results of 558 screening studies (296 mammograms and 262 MRI) were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and added cancer yield were calculated.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS:</title> <p>Malignancy was diagnosed in 13 patients, invasive cancer was diagnosed in 10 patients, and ductal carcinomas in situ was diagnosed in 3 patients. The median latency from completion of radiation to detection of the breast cancer was 18 years (range, 8‐37 years). Of the 13 cancers, 12 (92%) were detected by MRI, and 9 (69%) by mammography. For mammography, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 69%, 98%, 82%, and 95%, respectively; and, for MRI, these values were 92%, 94%, 71%, and 99%, respectively. In 4 of 98 patients, cancer was diagnosed on MRI only, resulting in an incremental cancer detection rate of 4.1% (95% confidence interval, 1.6%‐10%).</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSIONS:</title> <p>The current results indicated that MRI is a useful adjunct modality for screening high‐risk women who have a prior history of chest radiation therapy, resulting in a 4.1% (4 of 98 women) added cancer detection rate. The authors concluded that both MRI and mammography should be used to screen women in this high‐risk group. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.</p> </sec> </abstract>