Diagnostic approach for cancer cells in urine sediments by 5‐aminolevulinic acid‐based photodynamic detection in bladder cancer. Issue 5 (6th April 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diagnostic approach for cancer cells in urine sediments by 5‐aminolevulinic acid‐based photodynamic detection in bladder cancer. Issue 5 (6th April 2014)
- Main Title:
- Diagnostic approach for cancer cells in urine sediments by 5‐aminolevulinic acid‐based photodynamic detection in bladder cancer
- Authors:
- Miyake, Makito
Nakai, Yasushi
Anai, Satoshi
Tatsumi, Yoshihiro
Kuwada, Masaomi
Onishi, Sayuri
Chihara, Yoshitomo
Tanaka, Nobumichi
Hirao, Yoshihiko
Fujimoto, Kiyohide - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="cas12393-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Bladder urothelial carcinoma is diagnosed and followed up after transurethral resection using a combination of cystoscopy, urine cytology and urine biomarkers at regular intervals. However, cystoscopy can overlook flat lesions like carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic>, and the sensitivity of urinary tests is poor in low‐grade tumors. There is an emergent need for an objective and easy urinary diagnostic test for the management of bladder cancer. In this study, three different modalities for 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA)‐based photodynamic diagnostic tests were used. We developed a compact‐size, desktop‐type device quantifying red fluorescence in cell suspensions, named "Cellular Fluorescence Analysis Unit" (CFAU). Urine samples from 58 patients with bladder cancer were centrifuged, and urine sediments were then treated with ALA. ALA‐treated sediments were subjected to three fluorescence detection assays, including the CFAU assay. The overall sensitivities of conventional cytology, BTA, NMP22, fluorescence cytology, fluorescent spectrophotometric assay and CFAU assay were 48%, 33%, 40%, 86%, 86% and 87%, respectively. Three different ALA‐based assays showed high sensitivity and specificity. The ALA‐based assay detected low‐grade and low‐stage bladder urothelial cells at shigher rate (68–80% sensitivity) than conventional urine cytology, BTA and NMP22 (8–20%<abstract abstract-type="main" id="cas12393-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Bladder urothelial carcinoma is diagnosed and followed up after transurethral resection using a combination of cystoscopy, urine cytology and urine biomarkers at regular intervals. However, cystoscopy can overlook flat lesions like carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic>, and the sensitivity of urinary tests is poor in low‐grade tumors. There is an emergent need for an objective and easy urinary diagnostic test for the management of bladder cancer. In this study, three different modalities for 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA)‐based photodynamic diagnostic tests were used. We developed a compact‐size, desktop‐type device quantifying red fluorescence in cell suspensions, named "Cellular Fluorescence Analysis Unit" (CFAU). Urine samples from 58 patients with bladder cancer were centrifuged, and urine sediments were then treated with ALA. ALA‐treated sediments were subjected to three fluorescence detection assays, including the CFAU assay. The overall sensitivities of conventional cytology, BTA, NMP22, fluorescence cytology, fluorescent spectrophotometric assay and CFAU assay were 48%, 33%, 40%, 86%, 86% and 87%, respectively. Three different ALA‐based assays showed high sensitivity and specificity. The ALA‐based assay detected low‐grade and low‐stage bladder urothelial cells at shigher rate (68–80% sensitivity) than conventional urine cytology, BTA and NMP22 (8–20% sensitivity). Our findings demonstrate that the ALA‐based fluorescence detection assay is promising tool for the management of bladder cancer. Development of a rapid and automated device for ALA‐based photodynamic assay is necessary to avoid the variability induced by troublesome steps and low stability of specimens.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Cancer science. Volume 105:Issue 5(2014:May)
- Journal:
- Cancer science
- Issue:
- Volume 105:Issue 5(2014:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 105, Issue 5 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 105
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0105-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 616
- Page End:
- 622
- Publication Date:
- 2014-04-06
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Research -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1347-9032;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1349-7006 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/cas.12393 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1347-9032
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3046.603000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3168.xml